Paul....I can't feel my legs/Is He Dead or Alive?

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


KroniK 4-2-0

Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2008
Messages
670
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
34
Location
America
lol, I didn't read it all Lennie. You're not that important.....lol, j/k, j/k

And Shane? idk, he's all, old now.
 

The Leviathan

Active Member
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
2,504
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
36
Location
Philippines
I don't know but if the Buried Alive match at Survivor Series happens, and Kane wins after Bearer and VKM screwed Taker. Then VKM starts his Taker screws Taker campaign until the Deadman returns before Wrestlemania not to challenge Kane but Vincent Kennedy Mcmahon. You might call me crazy here but VKM loves to be apart of something and at Wrestlemania 25, he will be Taker's newest victim.
 

Qwake

Guest
Thats what I have been going for for years. Shane to take control of RAW! when i saw shane appear at the start of the first raw after the draft i was very happy lol. But when steph was there it ruined it :smh

I say Shane and/or Regal :y:
 

★Chuck Zombie★

Active Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2007
Messages
1,685
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
40
Location
St. Bernard/Cincinnati, Ohio
Yeah, duh. He referred to Paul, as in HHH's real name. Who woulda thought it was Bearer Vince was talking about? haha, what sense does that make?

Thank you. I was getting ready to say the same thing. Also, the fans backstage, lights falling etc. are to give the appearance of discombobulation and anarchy since Vince is gone....duh.
 

THE Brian Kendrick's Biceps

Guest
I just want to point out Trav that Taker vs Kane in a Buried Alive match at Survivor Series is not going to happen. They had McMahon vs Taker in it at the same event in 03, and Kane interfered to bury Taker alive.
 

KroniK 4-2-0

Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2008
Messages
670
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
34
Location
America
Taker gets buried too much. For a match to be his own, he sure loses a whole lot.

'Taker/Kane feud might happen, but damn, how many times can it?
 
Joined
Jul 7, 2008
Messages
123
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
32
Location
Reppin' NY
I'm going with Regal returning and keep order. Also, the vince getting injured also ties into the undertaker because maybe taker is mad at him because of him not helping the undertaker return or maybe from back when he buried the undertaker. Paul bearer hopefully is the one and kane/taker feud one last great time.
 

Travis40

Guest
Thank you. I was getting ready to say the same thing. Also, the fans backstage, lights falling etc. are to give the appearance of discombobulation and anarchy since Vince is gone....duh.

Kane would've been the person to cause that....Kane is the one to injure Vince
 

Hardcastle

Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2008
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
41
Location
west coast
all we can say now is that the WWE has done a great job with this angle : they created a big buzz on the net. We'll see if it helps the ratings
 

1chiban

Active Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2008
Messages
1,431
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
35
Location
UK
I don't think they've thought it out this far. I think the light thing adn the fan run-in were simply just to create the sense of disorder and to build upon the 'anything could happen on Raw live' feel they're going for atm to try and improve ratings.

Again I do not see Vince being part of this - one because Kane shouldn't care about Vince. Also, he cannot be referring to 'Taker - he didn't die, just got 'banished'. I guess Paul bearer is the obvious choice atm but I do not see the point of bringing him back, I cannot really see that being much of a ratings boost.

Also another 'taker/Kane feud would be boring as hell, just like the past 227 times it's happened since the initial (and exciting) feud.
 

Travis40

Guest
I know this is a long shot, but I have a feeling that htis could be the return of Eric Bischoff. I know he's doing his reality TV shit, but it would be awesome to see Bischoff as GM again.
 

THE Renegade Diesel

Active Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2008
Messages
1,879
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
30
I doubt Paul will be returning if you look at WWE.com.. It has Paul in the "where are they now?" article's.. I remember him on a boat or something..
Wait here's the link ;).. So IDK where everyone gets the ideas from but I doubt its happening.. As for Kane and the dead or alive thing.. I say the "Evil" Kane who controlled Kane when he had the mask on.. Or... The Undertaker.. I mean Undertaker didn't ruin the wedding.. He's been "attached" to the World Heavyweight championship.. Why not gead to Raw? Raw doesn't have as much star power with Triple H leaving.. Well then again they do have some big star's just not the mega stars.. The Undertaker, Triple H, Edge, and John Cena.. Well they have Cena but they have been sending Cena away from the championship with all the storylines.. It will be almost a year with Cena without a championship :jawdrop:
 

-TJ-

Guest
Cena not being a champion in a year? BS!

Read right here.

WWE Rule Handbook Chapter 84: Superstar rules Page 7, Rule 142 states that John Cena will be a WWE Champion every year and for about 6-12 months.
 

Beer

Guest
I bet, even though it does not make sense, he will be talking about Taker. Taker killed, Bearer, Kanes Mum and Kanes Dad and he wats him dead coz he killed everyone close to him. Most possible thng i can think of. Plus. who will pull more ratings for Raw, Taker or Bearer? I thinks Taker.