Anyhow, these interview segments were brilliant, and have HHH's fingerprints all over them. With DB and Reigns especially having the almost kayfabe breaking shoot element but while keeping it kayfabe is great. This is what we need from pro wrestling in 2015. HHH knows his audience and he knows it well.
I was thinking the same thing about HHH. Reigns' attitude was perfect, much unlike Batista's "I don't give a shit if I'm booed" and "the yes movement is the stupidest thing I've ever scene" interviews after he won the Rumble.
On Raw, there wasn't any "I won so you have to deal with it" speeches. Daniel Bryan acknowledged that acknowledged his victory last year, reminding people how he attained his victorious moment while reminding the pissed off fans that he never list the title and hence will likely get a run at it in the future.
And the final interview didn't waste time addressing the pissed off fans. It focused on Roman, Brock and Paul exactly the way it should. It reminded people that Paul definitely has a history with Reigns and Lesnar has a history with his family.
Vince never would have done that. He would have had Reigns be like "Forget about Daniel Bryan! ! He lost! I won!" Which although is true, it would have kept the focus off the actual title match. Instead they brought it around to where it meeded to be.
It's funny because Vince believes he has this built in sense for the wrestling business. I think that belief alienates hom from his audience. HHH on the other hand was a fan who became a wrestler, something Vince can never claim. I think that gives HHH a definite advantage in knowing what fans Want to see.