- Joined
- Sep 14, 2010
- Messages
- 6,305
- Reaction score
- 101
- Points
- 63
- Location
- In your girl's closet
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
Brock Lesnar had a 10 year no compete clause dumbass. He left in '04, and it took him 3 years to get a judge to rule that the UFC did not constitue "Competition".
Contracts are now revised to cover that situation as well. Not every contract is, but the ones that the WWE really invest in, their contracts are so damn binding that they are basicly property of the WWE.
And Name one damn star that left WWE and made TNA a credible threat. NOT ONE. TNA does not exist to the WWE. No matter who has left WWE, and gone to TNA, they have never broken more than a 1.4 rating. Infact, a 1.0 is considered success for TNA.
Vince will gladly give TNA his old trash, let them get huge contracts with TNA and weigh them down with those heavy contracts that produce no results what so ever.
Stop trying to throw BS at the wall hoping it will stick B/C your not arguing with a dumbass.
If you notice... nowhere did I state that anybody that left helped TNA get big. Nowhere did I state anything about ratings. Nowhere did I state anything about these guys helping improve ratings. What I said is they left and eventually went there.
And as far as Brock's contract goes... sorry I wasn't present for the signing and didn't get to read the fine print of it so whatever it was about his contract... I had no info on. Glad you were able to find all of that out though. Saved me a lot of paperwork to thumb through.
So... again... ratings... what does that have to do with anything? You're bringing in useless points that have nothing to do with anything to beef up what you're saying when what you are saying is nothing.
And your pic still makes you look gay.