Let me break this down. Is a DVD or reported history more correct in terms of factual evidence.
NO IT DOCMENT THE HOISORY OF IT! That show photos f world champion from 1908!
Let me break this down. Is a DVD or reported history more correct in terms of factual evidence.
So what? So you know if that was edited or not? Have you seen other pictures of it instead of basing it off of one source of information? No.NO IT DOCMENT THE HOISORY OF IT! That show photos f world champion from 1908!
So what? So you know if that was edited or not? Have you seen other pictures of it instead of basing it off of one source of information? No.
I RITE U TROLLER CASE CLOSET! @CRAYON TELL THEM!
A DVD proves only what is on it. The actual history proves much more.DUDE THE FUCKIN PROVE IS THE FUCKIN WATCH THE DVD! UNTIL U WATCH IT PLEASE STOP COMMENT HERE!
A DVD proves only what is on it. The actual history proves much more.
I'm just gonna try to settle this right here. How can the World Title in another company, in another place, over 100 years ago be the same title in WWE. It's a lineage. It's related to past world titles. If it were the same title, then the TNA title and the ROH title would be the same. Now I don't think that's possible.I RIGHT UR WRONG CASE CLOSED!
Once again, a DVD does not prove everything, only what is had on it. The actual history behind the belt proves everything. The DVD does not document EVERYTHING correctly.it docmenty u dumb person! That tell the history behind the world title! EITHER WATCH IT OR FUCK OFF!
I'm just gonna try to settle this right here. How can the World Title in another company, in another place, over 100 years ago be the same title in WWE. It's a lineage. It's related to past world titles. If it were the same title, then the TNA title and the ROH title would be the same. Now I don't think that's possible.
Once again, a DVD does not prove everything, only what is had on it. The actual history behind the belt proves everything. The DVD does not document EVERYTHING correctly.
You don't listen once again. Let me reiterate this one last time. The DVD is not completely correct nor does it showcase everything that happens. Take that into consideration before considering that the DVD is the on,y correct evidence out there.THAT SHOW THE HOISTY OF THE BELT OMFG LERIOSN! now stop reply until u watch dvd!
If you remember, WWE unified the WWF and WCW title, making the undisputed title. Months later, they brought back their own version of the Big Gold belt. Meaning THEIR OWN VERSION OF IT. Therefore, IT IS DIFFERENT FROM THE ORIGINAL WORLD TITLE.B/c it was The World Title then it was the NWA World Title then it become the WCW World Title when WCW broken away from WCW. The NWA title is still around but not title it was when it was with WCW. Keep there record from 1948 it but leagin of the Belt from WCW. ANd then WCW was taker over by WWE and then WWE had the world title!
You don't listen once again. Let me reiterate this one last time. The DVD is not completely correct nor does it showcase everything that happens. Take that into consideration before considering that the DVD is the on,y correct evidence out there.
If you remember, WWE unified the WWF and WCW title, making the undisputed title. Months later, they brought back their own version of the Big Gold belt. Meaning THEIR OWN VERSION OF IT. Therefore, IT IS DIFFERENT FROM THE ORIGINAL WORLD TITLE.