The facts that you do present are facts. But they aren't facts in the situation as they are incorrect/nullified by a previous statement. No.
Oldest Pro Wrestling Match On Film
- Thread starter Messiah1
- Start date
-
Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!
I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
UH A FUCKIN WWE DVD WITH ALL ANSTLELIST AND WRESTLER SAYING IT A FACT I THINK WARRENT IT AS A FACT STFU!
First off, not everything said in a DVD is true, better yet a WWE DVD. Also, as I've said before, facts are not war reneged as valid when they are nullified by a statement that proves it wrong.
there facts with sourceis! have u even the hoisaty of the wwe world champion dvd!? have u!?
DVDs do not outweigh the actual history of what happened. That DVD does not encompass everything. You're not realizing that. Those "facts" are either invalid or have no place in the argument.
I love how you don't catch onto the fact that he's blatantly mocking you.
Do they have any relevance into the argument being presented without being nullified? No.
Proper use of fair use.I didn't want to do it, but he called me a blueberry so I figured I'd get my revenge.
I RIGHT AND UR WRONG! AND U DON'T FUCKIN STOP IT RIHT I GOING TELL @Crayo and reported for being asshole when already proven I right and ur just trolling now! STFU!
I didn't want to do it, but he called me a blueberry so I figured I'd get my revenge.
:gtfo: