and why should the fight have gone to miller? for doing nothing? you have to go by what they did and dominant position is a big part of it, the judges are not allowed to judge on whats not happenening they have to judge on what occured and it may have been boring but shields was dominant in the boring aspect. and thats not boring to everyone, they were grappling for the most part, and there are people who make careers just going to grappling contest.
just cuz a fights boring you cant give it to someone who did nothing, i only had miller winning the first round and so did 2 of the 3 judges. they use the same system boxing does, and say mayweather lands 60 punches in a round but his opponent lands 3 and one rocks him, by rules youre supposed to give that round to mayweather becuase of the landed shots. same thing with shields and miller, miller may have done more damage during the fight but shields dominated him on the ground, just cuz you dont land a submission or that doesnt mean youre not dominating him. Miller was the bigger fighter and a natural 185 pounder meaning he dropped weight to make the 185 cut but shields had to put weight on to make it so by the fight miller had around a 10-20 pound advantage and if he couldnt get up then he's just a bitch.
and did i ever say rogers wasnt done? i said give him a few more seconds and if you fucking watched he blocked 1of the 4 shots(knowingly or not) and only 1 of the other 3 slightly landed. forbid if that was someone like couture or lesnar people would be crying the stoppage was early