Okay, after putting a lot of thought into it whilst I was bored in my exam, I kind of see the reasoning behind Cena winning. Though I don't agree with it.
It seemed so obvious that it was going to be Lesnar going over Cena last night, with Cena returning later in the year to defeat him. It was quite refreshing to see WWE do something totally unexpected - whether doing something unexpected is good or not is another matter.
Lesnar dominated the whole way through, he had a pin fall that would've been had he not knocked out the referee. Cena's win was completely fortunate and out of nowhere. Brock can just come out on Monday and say that he doesn't care about losing the match, he went to kick Cena's ass and suceeded.
Plus, if Brock had won last night he would've looked unstoppable. He would've absolutely destroyed the man who's easily the number one face of the WWE. Eventually though, Brock would've had to lose a match - but - who seems like a legimate threat to Brock Lesnar on the roster? I'm not just on about size, I'm on about the fact he would've just annihilated the man who's practically buried the entire roster at some point. I can't think of one supertstar who could be the one that took down Brock and actually gained something from it. The only three names that I can think of that could beat Lesnar are Triple H, Taker and The Rock. So maybe if they want him to put someone like Punk over, then they can't have him booked looking too strong, otherwise that will just look unrealistic.
I think these are some of pros to Cena going over, I still don't like the idea of it, but don't think it's as ridiculous as everyone has made it out to be.
:
