Eagles beating the Packers isn't impressive. Yeah no.Don't feel so happy, your last two wins weren't that impressive to be honest. The Eagles will probably end up second or third in the division. I can't see them going far.
Eagles beating the Packers isn't impressive. Yeah no.Don't feel so happy, your last two wins weren't that impressive to be honest. The Eagles will probably end up second or third in the division. I can't see them going far.
Don't feel so happy, your last two wins weren't that impressive to be honest. The Eagles will probably end up second or third in the division. I can't see them going far.
That's fine. I can respect that, and I would be the same way if I were you. Feels to me like it will come down to the final game of the year with the cowboys. I think all 3 teams will be there that last game. Tie breakers lean toward Dallas winning it, then eagles, and giants. Giants basically won't win any tie breakers. GL. Glad we got you guys early on.Right now I'm riding a wave with my Eagles team, I don't know if Foles is the future, but I will enjoy these times with my team.I could careless who plays QB for my team, I'll be fine with Fred Flintstone as my QB, as long as we are winning games lol.:dawg:
I don't really understand what you are trying to say there. If you are saying the Eagles win over the Packers was impressive, no. They were without Rodgers and were using a third string QB.Eagles beating the Packers isn't impressive. Yeah no.
Don't count out the Giants.That's your opinion everyone has one, but that division comes down to Cowboys and Eagles period and if these teams are still rolling that last game of the season means alot.
It was about as impressive as the giants beating the Rodgerless Packers. It's a good win, but with rodgers both teams more than likely lose.I don't really understand what you are trying to say there. If you are saying the Eagles win over the Packers was impressive, no. They were without Rodgers and were using a third string QB.
Giants don't mean shit at this point. Also, it just proves my point that the Packers are nothing without Rodgers.I don't really understand what you are trying to say there. If you are saying the Eagles win over the Packers was impressive, no. They were without Rodgers and were using a third string QB.
Dude, it's the NFC East. Even though they are 4-6, they still have a chance of winning the division.Giants don't mean shit at this point. Also, it just proves my point that the Packers are nothing without Rodgers.
No. That's like saying the Vikings can win because they have Peterson.Dude, it's the NFC East. Even though they are 4-6, they still have a chance of winning the division.
Well the Cardinals don't exactly look impressive, especially today.Giants only get in via Wildcard if they are lucky, they are 3-4 in the conference that means alot towards the end of the season.The Eagles have a tough game vs the Cardinals, if the Birds beat them, people might believe this team is for real.
Yes. The Vikings are a waaaaaaaaaaaaay different story, they suck all around. Giants had a bad start to the season. I wouldn't count them out.No. That's like saying the Vikings can win because they have Peterson.
Wait...the cardinals did look good today lol. I mean, granted it was against the jags, but they got the job done.Well the Cardinals don't exactly look impressive, especially today.
Well the Cardinals don't exactly look impressive, especially today.
They let the Jags score first. That's embarrassing. Yes, they won, granted, but that's sad.Wait...the cardinals did look good today lol. I mean, granted it was against the jags, but they got the job done.