New no-compete clause added to WWE contracts

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Stopspot

Now I’m a big, fat dynamo!
Joined
Apr 1, 2012
Messages
42,192
Reaction score
8,467
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Sweden
"Due to the situations with CM Punk and Alberto Del Rio, the WWE has included a clause in performer contracts that if they are fired for disciplinary reasons that they forfeit all merchandise rights and cannot work in pro wrestling or MMA for one year."

Credit Dave Meltzer, Wrestling Observer Newsletter.

WWE, greatest place to work ever, everybody.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Red Rain

The GOAT

The Architect
Hotshot
Joined
Mar 23, 2014
Messages
3,334
Reaction score
1,703
Points
0
Age
37
Given both Brock Lesnar and Del Rio got their normal No-Compete Clause thrown out the window in court, why should this one be any different?
 

Pop Tatari

Christian vieri
Joined
Mar 4, 2012
Messages
4,092
Reaction score
2,137
Points
113
Location
London, United Kingdom
I can sort of understand the merchandise thing but the one year non work is ludicrous. As lock said doubt it will matter given it has been overturned before.

Still I would not sign a wwe contract in a hurry, grass is not always greener on the other side.
 

Stopspot

Now I’m a big, fat dynamo!
Joined
Apr 1, 2012
Messages
42,192
Reaction score
8,467
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Sweden
Also this probably only means they "cannot work" in the united states. Since WWE lives in a world where you can only make money in the states despite evidence of the opposite.
 

Dolph'sZiggler

Biggest self-mark since Bret Hart
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
47,754
Reaction score
14,050
Points
0
Age
33
They may as well write in that if you leave WWE you have to commit seppuku in the Stamford parking lot because nobody is going to pay attention to their stupid shit anyway.

WWE: Hey, you can't compete
Competitor: Ehhh, sure I can.
 

Bort

WALKEN'
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
3,986
Reaction score
1,617
Points
0
Location
Bada Bing, New Jersey
It doesn't pass in the court, they can't forbid you to work in any industry, let alone TWO of them. Hence why Rey-Rey's and Alberto's attorneys brought them down quite easily. WWE law office = joke.
 

Green Jesus

The Showoff
Joined
Mar 4, 2014
Messages
874
Reaction score
270
Points
0
Age
29
Kind of dickish to add a clause that's only there to intimidate naive employees.
 

Jacob Fox

Quiet You
Joined
Sep 22, 2014
Messages
62,405
Reaction score
13,976
Points
118
But Vince, how many times have you said your product is sports entertainment and not wrestling. Why should you care if someone went off to wrestle, since that's not what you do.
 

Leo C

Backlund Mark
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
23,437
Reaction score
2,232
Points
0
Age
29
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
Well, this makes no sense nor I think they're allowed to do so, but if they're really as hell bent on doing this as they seem they really should try to get a good law clause or whatever because the current one is not working.
 

Jacob Fox

Quiet You
Joined
Sep 22, 2014
Messages
62,405
Reaction score
13,976
Points
118
I was trying to remember something because I actually had a similar clause in a hiring agreement back when I used to work for a benefits administration firm. They had a stipulation that once I left employment I couldn't work for six months or so in any benefits call center environment. I wasn't sure of the legality of it, but I was told afterwards that in the state I lived in if the clause was an unreasonable restriction on my ability to earn a living, then it was not enforceable. It never came up after I quit, but there were plenty of people who worked there who immediately got similar employment elsewhere.

I do know that in California it would not be enforceable regardless of where it was signed. California doesn't recognize most non compete clauses and does not allow out of state non compete clauses to be enforced. So even if they signed this contract, they would immediately be able to work in California whether WWE liked it or not.
 

Messiah1

The Showoff
Banned
Joined
Sep 20, 2013
Messages
919
Reaction score
211
Points
43
Location
Toronto
But Vince, how many times have you said your product is sports entertainment and not wrestling. Why should you care if someone went off to wrestle, since that's not what you do.

That's the thing, he doesn't want them going off entertaining elsewhere. It has nothing to do with wrestling.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Red Rain