kanenite95 said:the one from WM27 was what i was thinking of, when did they do it at 28?
kanenite95 said:i didnt say it was.
Crayo said:I'm shocked that all it takes for you to be entertained is swear words, blading and chair shots. May as well just bring in an edgy Ric Flair and give him 3 hours on RAW.
kanenite95 said:well thats not what i was implying, granted they can do more of it in a TV-14 environment, you dont need it. The beginning of the AE was PG i believe and they could do the stuff i listed. Like i said TV-14 doesnt = good product
Sad Panda said:How the hell would swearing and blood affect a wrestler's abilities and entertainment? :dafuq:
Hollywood Dolph'sZiggler said:PG rating doesn't = a bad product any more than TV 14 = a good product. It's why I don't understand why the IWC talks about ratings at all, let alone as much as they do alllllllllll the damn time.
kanenite95 said:im shocked that you cant deduce what i meant. Did I say thats all it took? no. I said i would like to see it once in awhile. I dont know if you think youre cool because youre some rebel against the AE because youre not.
Crayo said:Agreed again, climbing back up that list.
Ratings are so important for the IWC, I don't get why. This weeks 2.5 actually equals a 2.8-3.0 if it were 2 hours, which is normal for the WWE. No idea why the IWC is in panic mode, some claiming WWE is going down hill and going to go out of business (just look at least years Wrestlemania if you think that).
The sad fact is WWE don't NEED to change anything, apart from going back to 2 hours, that's it. We as fans want them too, but why would they care if they keep making more and more money?
Hollywood Dolph'sZiggler said:I meant ratings as in PG/TV 14, not neilsen ratings. Neilsen ratings, while pointless, are still fun to follow IMO