Mick Foley's reaction to RAW 2/24

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Edvy

The Artiste
Joined
Feb 23, 2014
Messages
255
Reaction score
17
Points
0
Age
28
Location
Some place only I know
All I have to say is I hope that Randy orton vs batista vs ??? thing is who we think it is cause the way its looking, the mid card matches and the crowds the only thing thats going to keep most people interest. Mick is speaking the truth WWE's problem is letting things go on for so long that it gets annoying. Lets just get to the point that we all Want to be chanting YES! YES! YES! after WM30
 

Snowman1

Chillin' with the snowmies.
Joined
Feb 5, 2012
Messages
33,052
Reaction score
11,726
Points
0
Location
Cuteville
OP: 200% with Crayo. Seeing someone speak for the fans is awesome.

Just to make the definitive Bryan post...

As for all the bitching about the fans bitching... doesn't this speak a lot about how good of a job WWE has done? The fans are pissed about Bryan because they created such a perfect storyline for him that was perfect for the times, and got the fans believing he (and therefore other new talent like Reigns, Wyatt, etc) was getting the rocketship and going straight to the top. Now we all can see that Bryan is the #1 babyface in WWE right now not only in crowd reaction but in positioning as well, but we don't feel like his journey to the top is complete without him winning the belt. And we all thought what better moment than the "Grandest Stage of them All" in a gigantic feel-good moment?

In the end... this just proves that Bryan is over, storylines are over, the belt is over, Wrestlemania is over for some reason, and at least 90% of the fans who are bitching will still watch anyway.

As for Bryan/Hunter. Is it really payoff for the Authority angle? The entire angle was about Bryan getting screwed out of the BELT and scratching and clawing his way TO THE TOP. The perfect way to stick it to Triple H was to win the belt when he wasn't supposed to and have a kayfabe reason to keep it. Now after all Hunter's done to screw Bryan over, Bryan getting his revenge on Triple H is a very nice second option... the problem is, when you're having to go to a "second option" because you can't mess with the obvious flop of Orton vs Batista is when the fans get upset. And no, Bryan gets no "rub" from beating Triple H outside of him not being stuck in a match nobody cares about. Not only is Bryan already beyond this, but what will beating a washed up Triple H do for him? This is probably Sting vs Magnus at Bound for Glory all over again where the young guy gets nothing out of beating someone who obviously has nothing left in the tank. Maybe it'll turn out better than that because of Bryan and the WWE agents who know how to make a big moment happen, but color me and everyone else unexcited.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wacokid27 and Laura

Dolph'sZiggler

Biggest self-mark since Bret Hart
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
47,754
Reaction score
14,050
Points
0
Age
34
I am sorry but you are living in kayfabe fairy land if you think DB gets more from becoming the late edition third fiddle (even if he wins the title) of the Ortista feud than he does by going over HHH at Mania. Last year at Mania HHH was going over Brock fucking Lesnar, and now people have the AUDACITY to say that DB gains NOTHING from going over the goddamn Game? Not buying it.
 

Dat Girl

Airhead and bubbly
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
23,236
Reaction score
7,063
Points
128
Location
619
Favorite Wrestler
romanreigns
Favorite Wrestler
danielbryan
Triple H doesn't have any credibility. Just look at how badly the Ultimate Warrior destroyed him yo.
 

JC4Life37

The Showoff
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
927
Reaction score
242
Points
0
Location
NoCal
I 2nd Ziggs on this one....its the HBK/HHH/Lesnar I'm bigger than the title analogy...it is possible to go over the wwe title

My position: clean over Cena and HHH and Batista >>> RR win and Mania win... u cats give far too much cred to tradition

Injured cats like Cena/Edge/Triple H/Batista all won the Rumble picking #25 and on..loss of cred there

Mania moments can be great...but the night after mania could be greater and more entertaining....


Where's Rock's mania moment by the way?...Mania 18 or 19... both were NON title matches...Mania 28?... past his prime
 

Laura

The Showoff
Joined
Nov 25, 2012
Messages
571
Reaction score
397
Points
0
Age
38
I am sorry but you are living in kayfabe fairy land if you think DB gets more from becoming the late edition third fiddle (even if he wins the title) of the Ortista feud than he does by going over HHH at Mania. Last year at Mania HHH was going over Brock fucking Lesnar, and now people have the AUDACITY to say that DB gains NOTHING from going over the goddamn Game? Not buying it.
The only reason Triple H went over Brock Lesnar at Wrestlemania is because of Triple H's ego. The match was needless. Even then, no one really wanted to see it and no one gave two fucks about Triple H's victory. You must really have an over inflated opinion of Triple H if you rate him so highly. The King of Kings is no different from The Best in the World - just a gimmick. DB is beyond Triple H at the moment. The angle was about DB overcoming the odds and becoming champ. That's what people what to see. I'm not saying he should be shoehorned into the title match (it's too late for any of that) but going over Triple H is a poor substitute for a true Wrestlemania moment.