Mexican police arrest cartel kingpin blamed for 600 murders

[LogicalWMD]

Take On LogicalWMD On Any Topic

You have to name a real topic, not just jump in like Trav40 and call me a smurf or my mother a whore or conjure up groundless insults. Preferably a wrestling topic, but if you insist, an unrelated newsworthy, scientific, ethical, philosophical, social scientific, literary, rock and roll, or cultural matter. If someone like Trav40 jumps in and just starts name calling, it will be ignored. You can use real life examples, but not just tell unrelated sob stories, again, like Trav40 did inj my last HIAT, especially ones like the one he made up. So try to make a fool out me. Insults won't work. I can turn them around like boomerangs.

 

[Trav40]

What about TNA. What do you think about the Lockdown PPV. Did you think that is sucked or that is was good. I actually think that it was okay, not great. I am sorry for all of the stuff that I said.

 

[This Guy]

Okay here's a topic for you. Why can you not be a bigger man and just let this trav40 thing go. You say you would ignore insults. Thats a bigger man thing to do, but you do take a couple minor shots at trav40 in doing so. What shot you might ask? The one where you once again insist that his story is made up. Made up or not what relevance is it to your post explaining the rules of your game? You said no sob stories. Well then it goes without saying that it can't be made up but instead you choose to say "especially ones like the one he made up". Maybe I'm not going to take you on in a topic, but my question to you is? How old are you? You give the impression that your much older then Trav, but act just as childish. So basically I have a challenge for you. Be a man, act your age (or if you are younger then you lead us to believe) act a little more mature. Stop taking cheap shots, and just let things go. And that challenge goes to everyone on this board cause I really get sick of seeing people taking cheap shots at people.

 

[LogicalWMD]

Not a Topic. Evolution is a topic. The Horsemen is a topic. How much we each know.

Okay here's a topic for you. Why can you not be a bigger man and just let this trav40 thing go. You say you would ignore insults. Thats a bigger man thing to do, but you do take a couple minor shots at trav40 in doing so. What shot you might ask? The one where you once again insist that his story is made up. Made up or not what relevance is it to your post explaining the rules of your game? You said no sob stories. Well then it goes without saying that it can't be made up but instead you choose to say "especially ones like the one he made up". Maybe I'm not going to take you on in a topic, but my question to you is? How old are you? You give the impression that your much older then Trav, but act just as childish. So basically I have a challenge for you. Be a man, act your age (or if you are younger then you lead us to believe) act a little more mature. Stop taking cheap shots, and just let things go. And that challenge goes to everyone on this board cause I really get sick of seeing people taking cheap shots at people.

5 people call me a smurf and find I'm better at firing back, and I'm the villain? Then I hone in on the fact that Trav has no father. Well Bingo. How am I supppose to know his age or if in fact his father did recently or tragically. The barrage of abuse he unloaded at me made it such that some overkill would serve as a wakeup call from "a bigger man", as I now learn he has a pattern of verbal irresponsibility. Believe, my manhood's been tested with work on both sides of the law. I've broken up kiddie porn rings, gun runners, and things best unmentioned, at great risk to myself. Anyway, your's isn't a topic, it's an extended whine or a litany of complaints. I want something that taxes our respective wits, not an argument ad hominem.

I don't care if you don't like me. We can still entertain as heel (me) and face head up in a proper match. Your post doesn't qualify. Bring up an original topic. Such as does one's genetic inheritance determine that they're going to be a heel or a face, or, a champion or a jobber? Or is it fair that HHH , by marrying Stephanie, probably was pushed more than, say, Val Venis, who never married Stephanie. Or, do you think that Bret Hart had real clout or in other words "stroke"? Or, What more entertaining, fake wrestling or "entertainment"? Or even, why is "c" squared in special relativity (e = mc.squared). Of course we can diss each other in the course of establishing cerebral or logico-lexical supremacy, you gravy sucking pigs!

There's no end to many interesting issues we could put our heads to. But your spiel about what you misconceive as my character does not come close to purview of this HIAT.

 

[Axis]

You're a fucking moron.

 

[Trav40]

Just don't listen to him. He's trying to get us pissed off and start a fight. Don't respond. He will just call you pigs. See I didn't do anything on this thread and he's calling me a pig.

 

[LogicalWMD]

The topic is Morons like Axis who Project Own Moronicty Onto Logical Ones

You're a fucking moron.

Well, quite a topic. This member reveals what Frued called "projection". Limited as he is to 5 words, and angry, at me or more likely at life, he adds the unnecessay adjective "fucking". So, in projecting moronicity to me, when I'm clearly not a moron, he reveals himself to feel intellectually stunted. And in gratuitously adding the word "fucking", he reveals his anger. He also reveals laziness in making such little effort as to post only 5 words. So we can conclude first, the moron is him, second that he's angry, and Third that he's angry at me. Why? I've done nothing but post self-deprecating posts, posts that attempt humour or ones that reflect wrestling or other knowledge. His anger could only stem from the fact that he doesn't like his life and I like mine. And we've establish that that post shows laziness.

So Axis, you're the Axis of Moronic Lazy Anger. Eat that and Choke. If you're just a little kid, please excuse me. I take them as they come and I'm playing heel. I think people will, "LearnToHateMe" and I'm over.

Who's next?

 

[Mike Chaos]

I don't know the situation at all but since you don't want people to call you a smurf I am going to label you as one since it obviously offended you. 5 people right?

w00t im numba# 6

LogicalWMD you are a fag (you may cry now)..

 

[Montana]

I really dont see why any hate is geared toward logicalwmd. I mean, he doesnt say anything about any post of anyone on the site, and always post logical in the wwe section. I really dont pay much attention to the other parts of the site. (Which apparently he isnt gained any friends)

Anyways He's ok in my book.

My question....Ring of Honor, any comments?

 

[Wrestling Station]

My question, Who's better, Goldberg or Batista? and why.

 

[LogicalWMD]

LogicalWMD is a Legendary Heel

I don't know the situation at all but since you don't want people to call you a smurf I am going to label you as one since it obviously offended you. 5 people right?

w00t im numba# 6

LogicalWMD you are a fag (you may cry now)..

It's not being called a "smurf" that makes me react, Mike, since my chick count is a matter of conceit. It's the blind stupidity of labelling anything or anyone that rubs one the wrong way "gay". As if any matter of incorrect taste or fact offends one's sexual orientation. That's the kind of stupidity that verbally betrays laziness, cheapness, and blocks communication. Call me anything you want, because "gay" means nothing in this context. Posts like that amount to "Hey, LogicalWMD, get this and get it good: '______, and _______. I didn't like your post so you're a _____ smurf. And your mother's worse, the lousy WH___!"
"Now ME, LogicalWMD , I have class! Not like you, you slimey LogicalWMD, You lowly M/Fer"

Mike, this HIAT and I'm playing heel. Don't take this personally and don't break Kaffabe(sp?). There's room for all types.

 

[The Nagasaki Dream]

I don't know the situation at all but since you don't want people to call you a smurf I am going to label you as one since it obviously offended you. 5 people right?

w00t im numba# 6

LogicalWMD you are a fag (you may cry now)..

Wow...you're really setting a good example as an administrator.

 

[LogicalWMD]

ROH? I Forefeit

I really dont see why any hate is geared toward logicalwmd. I mean, he doesnt say anything about any post of anyone on the site, and always post logical in the wwe section. I really dont pay much attention to the other parts of the site. (Which apparently he isnt gained any friends)

Anyways He's ok in my book.

My question....Ring of Honor, any comments?

Thanks for your kind words. I need all the help I can get. If the topic is Ring of Honor, I forefeit to you before any bloodshed. I've tried to watch it and just got bored or disgusted, so I've never learned anything. All I can say is any fed that boasts that a limited fat slob in corsetts like Samoa Joe (imaginative name huh?) is the best in-ring performer of his generation, is desperate for something, ANYTHING(!), to sell their product as anything but bush. But the "Joe" hype and the overrated CM Punk that ECW is now selling is all i know, so I forefeit. You win. Roh is on the "Fight Network" right now, but I'm reading and waiting for Classic Boxing, then some shut eye before a seminar at 11 am.

Cheers from the Heel

LogicalWMD

 

[Australian Badass]

Wow...you're really setting a good example as an administrator.

5 posts...WHat gives you the right to say that when you only have 5 posts?

 

[LogicalWMD]

Batista or Goldberg, who's better and why?

My question, Who's better, Goldberg or Batista? and why.

Few wrestlers have had such an impactful run as Goldberg's unbeaten streak, with the "Goldberg Chant" and the rapt attention of the wrestling world for that stretch of time. But once it played out, Goldberg had little left and he post streak career drew little heat. He's largely remembered as a fleeting comet, though my own assessment is more generous.

There's little resemblence between Batista and Goldberg, asides from their physical bearing, and Batista has more of it. Batista is mislabelled "The Animal", because he's painstakingly evolving into a very good worker, with the persona of a softspoken gentleman who accepts with gratitude the opportunities that unexpectedly came his way. When he's pushed to limits of reson, he reacts with an explosive burst of primeaval fury that juxtaposed with his normal softspokenness is shocking.

So Batista is a bit complex while Goldberg was unidimensional. Batista is also developing a decent repetoire of moves, unlike Goldberg's 2. Batista is getting good on the mike as opposed to Goldberg's "Who's Next!". Bastista is laying the foundations for a legendary career. Goldberg's claim to legend rests on a streak, which may be enough.

("Oh by the way, LogicalWMD, you're a fn smurf!" "Oh, boo hoo hoo! I thimply am not!" [editor's note] )