I suggest you look at the words you used... Not being utilized = Not being USED. >>>>>>>>>>>
So I wasn't specific even though I never said he wasn't be used, forgive me.
If that's what you meant, then I'd highly reccommend saying what the fuck you mean. :roll:
I never even fucking implied that he wasn't being used, you just assumed like you do quite often. So what the fuck do you think I was referring to? Because again, I never said he wasn't be used which means I was discussing him not being utilized properly. It is what I meant. I shouldn't have to clarify it but if you must know, yes it's what I meant.
...Now you're saying he got a push?
I don't think I'D have gone that far and I'm the one DEFENDING the way he was used (or "utilized" if you prefer).
So it wasn't a push, it was an attempt do something with him. My fucking bad. An attempt at a push. A brief push. However you want to say it.
So you're one of these morons that insist title shot = title reign? Fraid not... They told a story... One I might add which depicted that Kaval had what it takes to beat the IC champ... They eventually kept the title on the guy that was carrying all the heat (Ziggler)
None of that sounds wasteful to me.... Kaval was elevated to a level where the casual fan could percieve him as being a credible midcard champ some-time down the line.
It looks we have some progress. Instead of claiming I am one of the morons who insist a title shot means a title reign, you asked me if I am. This is good and no I am not. No a title shot doesn't mean or shouldn't mean(depending on the situation) a title reign. It's wasteful because it should have had a build up. They shouldn't have just thrown Kaval to have a brief feud with Ziggler imo.
It's the mid-card.... How much build-up do you expect.... Your average mid-card title match is not even announced on the previous week's show... I'm not saying this is a good thing, but it's nothing personal to Kaval's situation.
I don't expect nor even want a long build up but yes, a build up would have been nice. Something like Kaval picking up a few notable wins reaching closer to Ziggler. No it's not anything personal to his situation. I never implied that.
I genuinely can't recall the result of the match (or even who they faced) - I'll take your word for it - but a loss in a rather meaningless tag match is hardly a significant run of 'jobbing'. The tag match I spoke of between him & Kofi and Swagger & Ziggler that took place just a few weeks later showcased him as being on a similar par to the other 3 guys in the match, got lots of nice spots in and illustrated to me that they were indeed serious about him as a performer.
It was McIntrye and Rhodes. I never implied it was a significant run of jobbing but coming off the loss to Ziggler, it didn't do Kaval any favors. I never said he was jobbing or anything or denied him being used, only that he could and should have been used better imo.
End point: IF he'd have stuck around I think we'd have seen some nice stuff from Kaval.
O-N-W-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-R-D-S! >>>>>>>>>>>
I think we finally found something to agree on. No doubt we could have seen some epic things from Kaval. I do think and agree he should have waited a bit longer to see how things turn out but for whatever reason he didn't. Maybe there is more to it, I don't know.