Meltzer gives his funny opinion on the Axel push

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Lockard 23

The WWF/E Guru
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
6,691
Reaction score
1,927
Points
0
Age
37
Location
Union City, Tennessee
I don't have a schtick, I simply post my opinions. Your bullshit of hating on everyone who doesn't like an aspect of what WWE is doing is (the Ryback finish, finish to Raw) by saying they don't understand what was happening or 'it's happened before ::posts 20 examples' poindexter shit is annoying as fuck.

I'm supposed to know that HHH looking like he is stroking out is his way of selling a slegehammer shot from 24 hours earlier? I'm sure you pieced it together immediately but we aren't all geniuses. It took the rest of us 15-20 minutes to catch up to your level of brilliance, and when we did we pointed out how the segment could have been a lot better. How terrible of us to do so and not just accept what WWE did and praise them for it.

but if you need it spelled out, you are a pretentious asshole who thinks his opinion is the greatest thing in the universe and nobody here is impressed by it.

lol @ me being 'pretentious.' I have to listen to you do almost nothing but be negative about WWE and I'm the one who is pretentious. That is funny stuff.

I only post my opinions as well and (get this) when I scratch my head at certain viewpoints, then I point it out. Feel free to criticize my own viewpoints. Sort of the point of a discussion board. I'm sorry there's more than a few times where I don't "get" why people are negative about something. But just to dispute your "I praise everything WWE does and bash anyone who doesn't", I have bashed WWE for plenty of things in the past and will easily do so again when I feel the need to. Speaking of which, I said in a separate thread that them having Axel and Heyman disappear was strange and it would have better if Heyman was laughing maniacally at HHH while he was fading but I still wasn't exactly in confusion over the ending.

I didn't say people "didn't understand" the Ryback finish. I questioned why it was a big deal. Ending the match in a draw was logical and it was even briefly discussed on here. If Cena wasn't losing the title and they didn't want Ryback to take another loss, then the result is a draw. What would have been a more logical ending to you? If the end result is Ryback winning the belt (doubt it) then ending it in a draw stretches the feud to Payback where he might indeed win it there. And yeah, I've already made my POV on last night's ending clear so I'll leave that as it is.
 

Dolph'sZiggler

Biggest self-mark since Bret Hart
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
47,754
Reaction score
14,050
Points
0
Age
33
lol @ me being 'pretensious.' I have to lsiten to you do almost nothing but be negative about WWE and I'm the one who is pretensious. That is funny stuff.

I only post my opinions as well and (get this) when I scratch my head at certain viewpoints, then I point it out. Feel free to criticize my own viewpoints. Sort of the point of a discussion board. I'm sorry there's more than a few times where I don't "get" why people are negative about something. But just to dispute your "I praise everything WWE does and bash anyone who doesn't", I have bashed WWE for plenty of things in the past and will easily do so again when I feel the need to. Speaking of which, I said in a separate thread that them having Axel and Heyman disappear was strange and it would have better if Heyman was laughing maniacally at HHH while he was fading but I still wasn't exactly in confusion over the ending.

I didn't say people "didn't understand" the Ryback finish. I questioned why it was a big deal. Ending the match in a draw was logical and it was even briefly discussed on here. If Cena wasn't losing the title and they didn't want Ryback to take another loss, then the result is a draw. What would have been a more logical ending to you? If the end result is Ryback winning the belt (doubt it) then ending it in a draw sretches the feud to Pybakc where he might indeed win it there. And yeah, I've already made my POV on last night's ending clear so I'll leave that as it is.

7fc342b7a89f2ac0d42189d6eded242a.gif
 

Jonathan

Champion
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
17,031
Reaction score
2,969
Points
113
I think the way it was booked last night was fairly obvious to me. The doctors told him he can't compete (as a result of the previous nights endeavours) and he went against their orders and competed anyway, and suffered the consequences.

Also:

The Triple H angle at the end of Monday’s RAW was reportedly the start of a concussion storyline, according to f4wonline.com. Triple H will be kept off television for several weeks and when he returns, there is talk that Vince and Stephanie will also return and try to convince Triple H not to wrestle again due to the head injury.
 

Jonathan

Champion
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
17,031
Reaction score
2,969
Points
113
Can we please grow up with the petty images and basically slagging each other off over their opinions.

It's boring now.
 

Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
For the record, I actually appreciate users who stick up for WWE against the status quo. I have received multiple "you're just a WWE mark" accusations, and I do strongly believe the IWC is negative sometimes for the sake of being negative. I also agree with a lot of your points, but this one I don't. The ending was simply booked retardedly and sold retardedly. WWE, commentary, and anyone else involved did a poor job of putting the spotlight on Axel, and did a poor job explaining why HHH suddenly was selling a stroke. It had more of a Jerry Lawler heart attack feel to it than a "Oh shit Brock did some serious damage" feel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dolph'sZiggler

Jonathan

Champion
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
17,031
Reaction score
2,969
Points
113
For the record, I actually appreciate users who stick up for WWE against the status quo. I have received multiple "you're just a WWE mark" accusations, and I do strongly believe the IWC is negative sometimes for the sake of being negative. I also agree with a lot of your points, but this one I don't. The ending was simply booked retardedly and sold retardedly. WWE, commentary, and anyone else involved did a poor job of putting the spotlight on Axel, and did a poor job explaining why HHH suddenly was selling a stroke. It had more of a Jerry Lawler heart attack feel to it than a "Oh shit Brock did some serious damage" feel.

Yeah they could have explained it better on the commentary team, I'm surprised JBL didn't say something tbh. Jerry Lawler has just appologisd to Hunter for suggesting he had a stroke, via Twitter :facepalm:



Jerry Lawler ✔ @JerryLawler

I want to apologize to Triple H and his family for insinuating that he may have had a stroke. I know firsthand how upsetting it could be.
 

Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
Yeah they could have explained it better on the commentary team, I'm surprised JBL didn't say something tbh. Jerry Lawler has just appologisd to Hunter for suggesting he had a stroke, via Twitter :facepalm:
Jerry is just Blue and needs to leave commentary. I hope HHH's kids were offended and demand their Daddy to fire his wrinkly ass.

JBL was probably told not to talk, or to sell it like Cole was selling it -.-.
 

Farooq

Chairwoman of The New Day
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
23,193
Reaction score
7,027
Points
0
Location
619
Meltzer sounds like a fancy word for a melted cheese dish.