Meltzer gives his funny opinion on the Axel push

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Stopspot

Now I’m a big, fat dynamo!
Joined
Apr 1, 2012
Messages
42,192
Reaction score
8,467
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Sweden
Triple H has been high on Curtis Axel, the former Michael McGillicutty, for a long time now. He appears to be the one behind Axel's current push but the way Axel was booked on RAW left some people wondering.
Axel has another big supporter - The Rock. Rock and Axel trained together to prepare for Rock's most recent WWE pay-per-view matches.

So typical Meltzer. Triple H is high on him but some are confused over the booking, no shit sherlock. Not even using the news prefix for this one.
Read more
0db80a40d4479fff75b935d526292a57.jpg
-I'm a journalist!
-No Dave, just no.
 

Snowman1

Chillin' with the snowmies.
Joined
Feb 5, 2012
Messages
33,052
Reaction score
11,726
Points
0
Location
Cuteville
Calling Meltzer a journalist is like calling Jenna Jameson an actress.
 

Lockard 23

The WWF/E Guru
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
6,691
Reaction score
1,927
Points
0
Age
37
Location
Union City, Tennessee
Your know it all defend everything WWE does schtick is wearing thin.

Your "let's bash WWE no matter what" schtick is wearing pretty thin itself.

I bash WWE when I see a reason to bash them. I don't look for reasons for shit all over them though, and honestly, if one isn't bright enough to figure out the ending to last night's match, I don't what what to tell 'em. If you were aware of HHH's sledge hammer shot to the face at Extreme Rules and the referees trying to help him up, it doesn't take much but a simple put-two-and-two-together logic to figure out the after effect of that was what was causing him to faint on last night's Raw. I'm pretty sure they've run this sort of angle in the past with people, though I can't recall any examples at the moment. I just find it funny that HHH doesn't win, there is no burial, Axel doesn't even have to 'cheat' to win, HHH is selling a massive shot from Lesnar the night before (which gives Brock a lot of credit for leaving damages to HHH), etc. and yet some still find a reason to complain.

But if some need it spelled out to them, I'm sure next week, WWE will make it clear that it was in fact the sledge hammer shot that caused HHH's near loss of consciousness.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jonathan

Dolph'sZiggler

Biggest self-mark since Bret Hart
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
47,754
Reaction score
14,050
Points
0
Age
33
Your "let's bash WWE no matter what" schtick is wearing pretty thin itself.

I bash WWE when I see a reason to bash them. I don't look for reasons for shit all over them though, and honestly, if one isn't bright enough to figure out the ending to last night's match, I don't what what to tell 'em. If you were aware of HHH's sledge hammer shot to the face at Extreme Rules and the referees trying to help him up, it doesn't take much but a simple put-two-and-two-together logic to figure out the after effect of that was what was causing him to faint on last night's Raw. I'm pretty sure they've run this sort of angle in the past with people, though I can't recall any examples at the moment. I just find it funny that HHH doesn't win, there is no burial, Axel doesn't even have to 'cheat' to win, HHH is selling a massive shot from Lesnar the night before (which gives Brock a lot of credit for leaving damages to HHH), etc. and yet some still find a reason to complain.

But if some need it spelled out to them, I'm sure next week, WWE will make it clear that it was in fact the sledge hammer shot that caused HHH's near loss of consciousness.

I don't have a schtick, I simply post my opinions. Your bullshit of hating on everyone who doesn't like an aspect of what WWE is doing is (the Ryback finish, finish to Raw) by saying they don't understand what was happening or 'it's happened before ::posts 20 examples' poindexter shit is annoying as fuck.

I'm supposed to know that HHH looking like he is stroking out is his way of selling a slegehammer shot from 24 hours earlier? I'm sure you pieced it together immediately but we aren't all geniuses. It took the rest of us 15-20 minutes to catch up to your level of brilliance, and when we did we pointed out how the segment could have been a lot better. How terrible of us to do so and not just accept what WWE did and praise them for it.

but if you need it spelled out, you are a pretentious asshole who thinks his opinion is the greatest thing in the universe and nobody here is impressed by it.
 

leojay

Champion
Joined
Dec 22, 2011
Messages
4,240
Reaction score
526
Points
0
Location
Australia
Your "let's bash WWE no matter what" schtick is wearing pretty thin itself.

I bash WWE when I see a reason to bash them. I don't look for reasons for shit all over them though, and honestly, if one isn't bright enough to figure out the ending to last night's match, I don't what what to tell 'em. If you were aware of HHH's sledge hammer shot to the face at Extreme Rules and the referees trying to help him up, it doesn't take much but a simple put-two-and-two-together logic to figure out the after effect of that was what was causing him to faint on last night's Raw. I'm pretty sure they've run this sort of angle in the past with people, though I can't recall any examples at the moment. I just find it funny that HHH doesn't win, there is no burial, Axel doesn't even have to 'cheat' to win, HHH is selling a massive shot from Lesnar the night before (which gives Brock a lot of credit for leaving damages to HHH), etc. and yet some still find a reason to complain.

But if some need it spelled out to them, I'm sure next week, WWE will make it clear that it was in fact the sledge hammer shot that caused HHH's near loss of consciousness.

I mean, yeah, I guess it's logical. But it happening completely overshadowed his redebut. All the match served was a way to build the drama between Lesnar and HHH rather than building up "Axel". He felt out of place, somewhat ruining his redebut.

They booked themselves into a corner with it really. They didn't want Axel to look too dominant by beating him but they didn't want him to look weak by losing. The match never should've happened tbh.
 

Dolph'sZiggler

Biggest self-mark since Bret Hart
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
47,754
Reaction score
14,050
Points
0
Age
33
I mean, yeah, I guess it's logical. But it happening completely overshadowed his redebut. All the match served was a way to build the drama between Lesnar and HHH rather than building up "Axel". He felt out of place, somewhat ruining his redebut.

They booked themselves into a corner with it really. They didn't want Axel to look too dominant by beating him but they didn't want him to look weak by losing. The match never should've happened tbh.
You just aren't a sophisticated enough fan to understand the finer ins and outs of what was going on. Simpleton.
 

Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
Sorry Kevin, but if we have to think "Maybe he was like that because of the hammer shot last night?" then WWE are not doing their jobs. Casuals won't think like that if the smarks aren't. The ending was POORLY booked. It was a good idea (have him show effects of last nights beat down) but it was poorly executed.