Matt Striker significant allegations

[Sky]

https://twitter.com/m4rvelgirl/status/1743862469284520441

Would not be surprised, this was in response to a call he made on MLW when he blamed Matt Riddle's personal failings on "the court of public opinion" so we know who he is

 

[Samoa Looch]

I don't know... seems odd the way this comes out of nowhere as a response to a call a commentator made (I assume) in character. The timing is weird and doesn't really help it all, especially with how she immediately jumped on the kill-Jericho-bandwagon just a week ago.

Of course, if it happened the way she said it, it's horrible and I won't be really shocked either.

 

[The Gipper]

I’ve heard stuff about Matt Striker being a creep for a while now so this doesn’t surprise me unfortunately.

But at the same time, Striker could have very easily just not bring up the fact that Riddle's a sex pest. Like he made it a point to bring up his opinions, has he tried focusing on you know…the wrestling? Bizarre.

 

[OMB]

I mean def not the smartest thing to say on TV. As for allegations, I hold judgment till I see more obvious if he's found guilty or evidence enough is there full stop get him out.

 

[Chris]

Half his commentary nowadays is about cancel culture now so this will just give him more bits that don't get over and now it will be like 25% good commentary where he was already to about 50%

 

[OMB]

Half his commentary nowadays is about cancel culture now so this will just give him more bits that don't get over and now it will be like 25% good commentary where he was already to about 50%

Sad to hear. I loved him growing up

 

[Chris]

Sad to hear. I loved him growing up

Me too and it's really annoying when he still has his moments where he's great.

The funniest bit is when Joe tries to talk about an actual angle and Matt is like "there's wrestling going on Joe why don't we talk about that" and two minutes later he's going on a rant about how social media is bad which has nothing to do with the match or angle

 

[Deezy]

I need to know the rules on blindly believing Twitt.....X allegations.

I don't even like this fuck and think he's been the worse colour commentator since he started......I just need the rules.

 

[Sky]

I need to know the rules on blindly believing Twitt.....X allegations.

I don't even like this fuck and think he's been the worse colour commentator since he started......I just need the rules.

99% of the time they're legit. The remaining 1% is that one person who piggybacked off SpeakingOut to make a burner account and invent things about Mick Foley

 

[O-Blaze]

99% of the time they're legit. The remaining 1% is that one person who piggybacked off SpeakingOut to make a burner account and invent things about Mick Foley

Idk. 99% seems rather high tbh. Even then, people still believe stuff even after it’s proven untrue because they made up their mind about it and nothing will change that.

 

[Professor Booty]

Yeah I’d def say it’s far less than 99% but I also feel Sky was joking in her post about it being so high.

 

[Chris]

No one's even really rating these claims by themselves anyway, I'm just saying Striker sucks now

 

[Professor Booty]

No one's even really rating these claims by themselves anyway, I'm just saying Striker sucks now

He was decent on LU but for the most part I’ve never been a fan

 

[Barry Poppins]

Striker has always sucked in my opinion and I've always heard he was a bit of a fuckin cretin anyways, so this accusation doesn't shock me one bit.

 

[Comrade Khan]

In this case it's a pretty detailed account so I'd rate it as plausible, especially that he's been a creep for a while

My only iffyness is the person in question is a perpetual attention seeker