Matt Hardy and Helms to jump ship?

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
2,923
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
41
Location
Badstreet, USA
If we're thinking of people who need their walking papers it definitely needs to be the Nastys (who the fuck wants to see these dudes in a feud with the Duddleys?). Then trim some fat with letting Sharky Boy, Rhino, that fuck hole Deaner dude, Consequences Creed, and the lot of unknown, untalented dudes. Personally I'd throw Eric Young and Matt Morgan to the curb as Tomko is everything Morgan isn't and Eric Young, I just don't see any redeeming qualities in. I'd hire folks like Joey fuckin Ryan (who I'd team up with Valbowski) or Brian Kendrick, both of whom can talk and wrestle. Paul London can wrestle, but TNA has enough dudes like that already.

If Vince has proved anything it's that he's a vindictive asshole. Look what they're doing to Mickie amidst rumors of her leaving to pursue music. Who do you think he's going to be taking his frustrations over losing Jeff out on? I'll give you a hint, he's got the same last name.
AND he's rumored to be leaving on top of that? Pshhhh, forget about it.
Well it wouldn't be much of a downgrading for Matt anyways, Vince has always thought of him on a much lower level than Jeff. Remember how much shit the poor guy had to endure when the Edge/Lita thing was made public and turned into an angle? He went nowhere after that. Outside of the ECW title reign and his feud with Jeff, the last four years have been basically filled with valleys for poor Matt, he just doesn't have the "it" that Jeff has.

As far as Helms goes, he can still go and would actually make a good addition to the X division and he's still got some identity too. Just don't pai
 

DcDudley

Member
Joined
May 22, 2007
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
Points
6
Age
44
Location
Norway
Seening the what they did to keep Charlie Haas away from Tna, I really dont think they will let any of those people go without a fight.
 

The Rated R CMStar

Guest
If Vince has proved anything it's that he's a vindictive asshole.

Hogan, Ultimate Warrior, Christian, Bischoff, Bret Hart, all beg to differ.
 

NinoBrown

Active Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
3,129
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
35
Location
Toronto, Ontario
They just need a second show. Put the same one on thursday and do a live one on tuesday, imo.

Not with the potential ratings they'll get from reruns of Entourage.

Most know I hate Matt Hardy and I think it's a good idea. Does he even have any feuds or storylines going on? With Hogan's "fight for your part" this might lead to something he hasn't had in the WWE for months, something interesting.
 

Mike Chaos

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
698
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
36
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
Don't know how I feel about this. I'd rather TNA focus on their own talent rather than bringing in a bunch of new guys. That said, with a bigger roster, they'll have to see that they need to get 2 shows to have them all on.

I never seen the hype IWC gave Burchill til recently with his matches on ECW. The guy can go. Since then, I wondered why they never pushed the guy.

2 shows = madness. I seen a video of Eric Bischoff on the WWE legends of the round table discussion when he talked about when Turner gave WCW another show. And Eric didn't want another show because it would be overkill. For the writers, himself and the wrestlers. And it was true. WWE has the right idea one show for a certain group of wrestlers. Before Smackdown and Thunder we were able to suffice with just RAW and Nitro on, once a week. Probably the downfall of WCW was over exposing their product with two shows.
 

Double J

Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2009
Messages
767
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
39
Location
Louisiana
Seening the what they did to keep Charlie Haas away from Tna, I really dont think they will let any of those people go without a fight.

Sorry but what exactly did they do? I never knew Haas was looking at TNA, although I'd rather him go there.


As far as Matt/Shane I think it depends on what happens with Jeff's trial. If Jeff does go to jail then it would of been pointless for Matt to jump to TNA. Also Jeff and Shannon were in TNA before, how is this time any different for Matt?
 

Great One

Guest
Wow, Kendrick and London aren't signed? Can't believe these guys aren't in TNA already. I know London had some fuck up with them before I think, but meh.
 

DcDudley

Member
Joined
May 22, 2007
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
Points
6
Age
44
Location
Norway
Sorry but what exactly did they do? I never knew Haas was looking at TNA, although I'd rather him go there

Not sure if this is a 100% right, but it's what i've heard.

The situation with Charlie Haas demonstrated WWE’s reaction to any competition. He was of course offered an improved contract amid speculation he may leave for TNA, even though the company had no creative plans for him

-from the wrestling observer newsletter