Marty Jannetty or Mark Henry?

[Montana]

I think i'll go with Mark Henry on this one.... ( i think this is where Booker wanted someone to take it)

The WWE is built on Monsters, and therefore I felt the WWE dropped the ball with Henry years ago. I understand there were injuries, and he SUCKED when he debuted, but they brought him in too fast. Had they train him for a few years before debuting, he could have made a much more impactful debut. I feel like they could have turned him into a good big man, but turned him into a joke instead. if built right, I'd say he had potential to main event. The dude is pretty athletic for how big he is. Better Mic Skills than Jannetty. Jannetty didnt have "The look" nor the charisma to make it far in the WWF. Strictly in terms of wrestling, yeah Jennetty was better, but the WWF doesn't look for that. Jannetty didn't have enough X-factors to make him special as a solo wrestler.

 

[Airfixx]

I also agree that Jannetty would have eventually trickled back down the singles ranks after the Rockers split/fued.... Either that or fixed up with another tag partner (see Jim Neidhart when Bret went solo) which is (more often than not) doomed to failure... Oh wait, that actually did happen a few years later....

Jannetty & Leaf Cassidy as The New Rockers (whilst at the same time HBK is world champ) anyone? lol

As for Henry, agree with TBKB... Based on current skills, as an all-rounder, one of the best bigmen they've had in WWE. I hate the writers for not allowing him to capitalise on the momentum of his amazing face-turn.


Henry WINS!

 

[adhyanta]

Why does it seems like they never have a clue on what to do with Henry?
Give the guy a proper role that suits him best. The strongest man in the world have earned that.