Major WWE PPV might be getting ‘scrapped’

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Rosie

Neo Genesis
Joined
Apr 16, 2016
Messages
45,366
Reaction score
20,753
Points
128
Location
New Brunswick, Canada
Favorite Wrestler
9yQJpez
Favorite Wrestler
edge
Favorite Wrestler
dJvrW4y
Favorite Wrestler
kevinsteen
Favorite Wrestler
Se3BZPQ
Favorite Wrestler
q9gbHdQ
Favorite Sports Team
2DciFqq
Favorite Sports Team
OQcgyMS
Favorite Sports Team
coloradoavalanche
Favorite Sports Team
vCLYUUD
I'll be happy if they get rid of the gimmick PPVs and focus on just having appropriate stipulations at the right time for feuds. Although I think there can be an exception for once a year things like the Rumble, the Elimination Chamber and to a lesser degree Money in the Bank, the stipulations that truly require blood feuds need to be saved for them.

On the idea of Money in the Bank, I'll straight up say: I think Money in the Bank is dead as an effective concept to create a new star long term. Let me explain. The Money in the Bank contract for the past several years has been a mixed bag in terms of either creating a legit main event star long term. Even with two, it just hasn't worked. The year the Women's MITB got brought in Carmella won it (with the help from a human Toad with no chin who loves to stalk kids on X-box) she had a long time with it. But by the time she cashed in, her women's title run was a bit meh? She was a good chicken shit heel, but by the time she lost the belt she hasn't really been seen as a main eventer. The same year, Corbin won the men's, failed his cash in, and his career has been very up and down since.

Next year: Braun won the men's, failed his cash in, and had a bad heel turn. Alexa Bliss won, cashed in the same night.

Year after: Brock won which the best thing we got from that was Boom Box Brock, but he didn't need it to get a title match because he always has a Brock Lesnar in the bank. Bayley won, good thing is kickstarted her slow burn heel turn. But also... cashed in the same night back to back years.

Then we the COVID MITB. Otis... poor Otis. Asuka, basically was retroactively for the Raw Women's title because of Becky's pregnancy.

2021: Nikki ASH, cashed in night after (Wow, what a long time with it?) and her title run was really weak. Big E. He was probably one of the best MITB winners during this period minus the fact they telegraphed his MITB win to pop a rating which hurt the moment a bit and his title run was a mixed bag and then sadly he got injured afterwards when they put him back to Smackdown.

Then we have this year with another quick women's cash in with Liv Morgan, then Austin Theory, we'll see.

I don't know, but with all this time I think the Money in the Bank ladder match has lost its effectiveness. Either we have quick cash ins, or no long-term plans after the cash in.
 

Death By Looch

Peace, Love & Fuck You
Joined
Jan 29, 2020
Messages
131,670
Reaction score
53,328
Points
118
Age
36
Favorite Wrestler
undertaker
Favorite Wrestler
arnanderson
Favorite Wrestler
braywyatt
Favorite Wrestler
vader2
Favorite Wrestler
yujinagata
Favorite Wrestler
bethphoenix
The idea behind the MITB is still perfectly fine and still would work to elevate the winner, they just have to do a better job booking-wise and like I said before, having two MITBs is just too much... and with them wanting to bring KOTR/QOTR back as well, the best thing to do is neither doing two MITBs each year, as well as both tournaments.

Like I said before, they'd drive best with having one MITB match at Mania either for men or women and having a xOTR tournament for the other division that didn't get the MITB match, with the winner getting a title shot at the SummerSlam, if they actually put it before the SS in the PPV calendar. The year after, they just switch it around. That'd give both things a much bigger meaning and gives them such a better possibility to actually produce big things out of them. ...but I guess that's not gonna happen anyways, with how they believe they have to do it like they do for years now, even if it's simply not good.
 

Chris

Dreams are Endless
Joined
Dec 23, 2011
Messages
383,742
Reaction score
155,564
Points
128
Age
28
Location
Texas
Favorite Wrestler
tLCb5kv
Favorite Wrestler
OEndG4L
Favorite Wrestler
ArsUxsj
Favorite Wrestler
mrperfect2
Favorite Wrestler
eelOIL6
Favorite Wrestler
BryanDanielson1
Favorite Sports Team
sfa
Favorite Sports Team
dallascowboys
Favorite Sports Team
sanantoniospurs
Favorite Sports Team
texasrangers
I always thought about this in 2010 when the PPV was introduced a few months after there was a match at Mania lol it didn't matter obviousky bc Swagger cashed in so soon before the PPV was announced but I've always wondered what if :lol
 

Dale

Super Moderator
Joined
Dec 17, 2010
Messages
33,167
Reaction score
22,247
Points
118
Location
England
Favorite Wrestler
ui9LmS7
Favorite Wrestler
Y06mUrE
Favorite Wrestler
EtPxwR9
Favorite Wrestler
eAVr0ua
Favorite Wrestler
GDgC9g9
Favorite Wrestler
zPa7dqi


Definitely get the vibe from him here that HIAC is officially done as a PLE, while the Chamber and MITB look to be sticking around just potentially shifted around.​
 

Cwalker

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
39,050
Reaction score
18,448
Points
118
Favorite Wrestler
randyorton
Favorite Wrestler
romanreigns
Favorite Wrestler
codyrhodes
Favorite Wrestler
adamcole2
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles
Favorite Wrestler
jaylethal
Favorite Sports Team
BZw58qk
HITC needs to be scrapped as a PPV concept; to an extent so does MITB.
 
  • Like
Reactions: #Waddles

Comrade Khan

The Ace of WS
Joined
Dec 2, 2019
Messages
245,643
Reaction score
76,838
Points
118
Age
38
Favorite Wrestler
9yQJpez
Favorite Wrestler
9Cf16sP
Just keep them as match types n not as full on PLEs, nothing wrong w the matches themselves its just gimmicking an entire ppv is lame after a few years
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hidden Blaze

Dale

Super Moderator
Joined
Dec 17, 2010
Messages
33,167
Reaction score
22,247
Points
118
Location
England
Favorite Wrestler
ui9LmS7
Favorite Wrestler
Y06mUrE
Favorite Wrestler
EtPxwR9
Favorite Wrestler
eAVr0ua
Favorite Wrestler
GDgC9g9
Favorite Wrestler
zPa7dqi
HITC needs to be scrapped as a PPV concept; to an extent so does MITB.
I agree about HITC but I don't think MITB has to be scrapped as a standalone event though I won't be mad if they do become staples at Mania again though. Elimination Chamber absolutely has to stay though.
 

Cwalker

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
39,050
Reaction score
18,448
Points
118
Favorite Wrestler
randyorton
Favorite Wrestler
romanreigns
Favorite Wrestler
codyrhodes
Favorite Wrestler
adamcole2
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles
Favorite Wrestler
jaylethal
Favorite Sports Team
BZw58qk
I agree about HITC but I don't think MITB has to be scrapped as a standalone event though I won't be mad if they do become staples at Mania again though. Elimination Chamber absolutely has to stay though.
I’m cool with EC staying. I’d be cool with MITB back at Mania if they did one on Night 1 and one on Night 2
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hidden Blaze

Sabretooth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2011
Messages
77,222
Reaction score
9,532
Points
113
Age
26
I would love for it to be back at Mania. Made it even more special and allowed a star to get their wrestlemania moment.
 

Y2Jayne

2 levels above, 2 steps ahead
Joined
Jul 26, 2013
Messages
13,985
Reaction score
9,185
Points
113
Location
Toxic Lounge
Favorite Wrestler
chrisjericho2
Favorite Wrestler
DeSDzbM
Favorite Wrestler
9nCExBd
Favorite Wrestler
LDuO6dG
Favorite Wrestler
LBaYVuW
Favorite Wrestler
ToxicA
I don't mind it as a PPV as much as Hell in a Cell
 

Cwalker

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
39,050
Reaction score
18,448
Points
118
Favorite Wrestler
randyorton
Favorite Wrestler
romanreigns
Favorite Wrestler
codyrhodes
Favorite Wrestler
adamcole2
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles
Favorite Wrestler
jaylethal
Favorite Sports Team
BZw58qk
HITC just started feeling forced as a PPV.

Like there were times in the PPV era where it was warranted; I can think of Cena/Orton in 2009 and 2014.

But then there were times like Punk/Taker and Rollins/Wyatt where it’s the first match in the program and it just didn’t make sense
 

Lackin

I'm a F'kn Mark - It's my real name.
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
3,001
Reaction score
683
Points
113
Age
26
Location
Cheshire, UK
Favorite Sports Team
zFgjY9e
I'm on the fence, I loved watching MITB back at Mania's felt like a huge deal and was a added highlight to the show of shows. But that was back when it was one match on a one night 4hr show that allowed not as major talent a platform to showcase themselves. Nowadays with 8-10hrs of Mania I feel like it will be lost in the shuffle. The only gimmick PPV's I actually like to see on the schedule is RR, EC and MITB. I understand the need to possibly discontinue HIAC as a PPV but MITB hasn't got the same problem, that being running the match just because of the time of year and not on the severity of the rivalry.
 

Deezy

DZ PZ
Joined
Nov 13, 2010
Messages
139,458
Reaction score
39,394
Points
118
Location
Canada
Favorite Wrestler
brethart2
Favorite Wrestler
newjack
Favorite Wrestler
ddp
Favorite Wrestler
therock
Favorite Wrestler
nwo
Favorite Wrestler
wolfpac
MITB belongs at Titan Towers and people gotta get thrown off the top of the building.
 

Wiseman

O.J.A.S.
Joined
Sep 14, 2022
Messages
9,255
Reaction score
5,422
Points
233
Location
Burbs of Pennsylvania
Favorite Wrestler
chrisjericho
Favorite Wrestler
braywyatt
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles
Favorite Wrestler
danielbryan
Favorite Wrestler
eddiekingston
Favorite Wrestler
coltcabana
Favorite Sports Team
2JJnnx8
MITB belongs at Titan Towers and people gotta get thrown off the top of the building.
I can not argue with this statement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deezy