Magazines rip into Triple H and the SvR2009 advertising thing

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Tsaalyo Phoenix

Active Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
1,955
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
36
Location
St. Catharines, Ontario
A few weeks ago it was reported that Fighting Spirit, a magazine based out of the U.K. that covers professional wrestling as well as MMA, had revealed portions of the private memo World Wrestling Entertainment/THQ sent out to members of the video gaming press covering the upcoming SmackDown vs. Raw 2009 video game. WWE wants to control how SmackDown vs. Raw 2009 is portrayed in previews when displaying screenshots of the game. What with WWE’s new toned-down, PG-rated product, the video gaming press is forbidden from showing screenshots of any of the Superstars bleeding or using weapons. However, the really interesting part coming out of the memo is that WWE/THQ said the video gaming press is forbidden from showing screenshots of digital Triple H “in a defenseless or vulnerable position.â€￾ There was said to be some major heat between WWE and Fighting Spirit as information from the memo wasn’t supposed to be publicly revealed.

Fellow U.K. wrestling magazine Power Slam corroborated the situation in a recent issue, most notably, the portion of the memo concerning Triple H not being shown in a weak or vulnerable position. Power Slam reveals that WWE/THQ did not ask anyone else on the WWE roster be ‘protected’ in this manner, only Triple H.

Below are the two magazines’ respective articles on the situation:

Digital Politics (Fighting Spirit Issue No. 32)
WWE videogame feels the Triple H Effect


We all know how much Triple H loves squashing five guys on Raw or killing Kenny Dykstra for no good reason on SmackDown. The extent to which he’s protected and booked to look indestructible on WWE television is an old and very sad story. So maybe it was inevitable that the same mentality would spill over into WWE’s video games, too.

With SmackDown vs. Raw 2009 out in November, early game code has been sent out to videogames press. And one of our button-bashing buddies got in touch to inform us of some new directives that game journalists must abide by with this year’s version of the game.

“Got WWE preview code yesterday and, as always, screenshots have to be approved if we decide to take our own. So far, so usual. But here’s the interesting part: there are further stipulations that highlight which screenshots will immediately be given the thumbs down.

These include screenshots of ’superstars’ (not allowed to refer to them as wrestlers) bleeding, weapons being used… and we’re not allowed to take ANY screenshots of Triple H losing or ANY screenshots of Triple H in a ‘defenceless or vulnerable position’. Oh, and the game still sucks.â€￾


That’s right, Hunter is so paranoid about protecting his spot that he’s holding down people in videogames! What a dork. Fortunately, his very own theme song tells us that, “It’s all about the game, and how you play it / It’s all about control and if you can take it.â€￾ Well, we have taken control and we’ve made sure Triple H is both defenceless and vulnerable in the screenshot to the left. Sorry Paul!

Preferential Treatment (Power Slam Issue 171/October 2008)

THQ, publisher of the forthcoming SmackDown vs. Raw 2009 video game, has helpfully distributed a WWE-approved list of guidelines which all magazines are expected to adhere to concerning screenshots used in conjunction with reviews of the game.

Attempting to minimise the violence in the game, WWE and THQ have decreed: “Do NOT show blood.â€￾ And, “If using weapons, do not show anything with significant force (or intent to have).â€￾ These directives are in accordance with WWE’s new toned-down, PG-rated product.

However, we’re not sure how WWE and THQ can justify the clause pertaining to Triple H in the SmackDown vs. Raw 2009 screenshot guidelines. It states: “Refrain from showing Triple H in a losing/defeated/defenceless position.â€￾ THQ does not ask that anyone else on the WWE roster be ‘protected’ in this manner: magazines are only forbidden from printing screenshots of HHH “in a losing/defeated/defenceless position.â€￾

Is that guy insecure, or what?

- WZRradio.com

:roflmao:
 

1chiban

Active Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2008
Messages
1,431
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
35
Location
UK
Oh dear, that is awful. I used to say that we don't really know if Triple H is as bad as some reports say he is and none of us are backstage. But if it was an official WWE memo then he's obviously had some input on that. Let me guess, Trips will be unbeatable in the game ? :D
 

Kaedon

Active Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2007
Messages
2,855
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
42
The internet cant get off his jock.
 

Chuck Taylor's Grenade

Guest
Did this somehow stop being a work when I was asleep? I could have sworn it didn't matter who won or lost as long as the crowd was hot and the wrestlers, I mean superstars, I mean entertainers, I mean aw fuck it, got paid. I guess somewhere between training and marrying the boss's daughter this became real to him.
 

C4

Guest
lol, this is extremely funny for me.

WWE can't protect Triple H no matter how much they try and do, they can't go on and sue everyone for showing forbidden screenshots of digital Triple H “in a defenseless or vulnerable position" These guys are totally crazy, I can't believe they're even trying to stop the screenshots.
 

kingovkings

Active Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2007
Messages
1,546
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
50
Location
ENGLAND UK
I got power slam and the entire piece on HHH rips him to bits. Its a total negative piece on him. So believe what you want. Haters will believe every word written. Marks or fans will make up there own mind. As for the game memo I'm not sure what to believe but seen as Trips is champ then yeah i can see there point if in fact its true. If it was Tista or Cena then the same memo Probs would have gone out. HHH is the champ for gods sake thats probs why. I would imagine it would be the same for anyone with a champ title reign.
 

Chuck Taylor's Grenade

Guest
who cares? If he keeps burying everybody he's not going to have a company to work for because the merchandise sales, PPV buyrates, house show crowd, television show crowd will all dry up. Doing jobs doesn't hurt anybody's career and the last time I checked this was still a work.

Here's an interesting fact-Triple H has not lost a match (singles, triple threat, tag, or other) by pinfall or submission nor has he been pinned or submitted in a tag team match (his partner was always the one to take the fall) since December 16, 2007 when he was beaten by Jeff Hardy. And any match he didn't win was either a DQ or a no contest. Wow.
 

Hometown Kid

Guest
Let me guess, Trips will be unbeatable in the game ? :D

Interesting fact in the U.S. demo as Matt Hardy I did a Side Effect, 2 TOF and 2 top rope TOF on Trips and he still kicked out. xD

The internet cant get off his jock.

Official WWE memo imo. :y:

who cares? If he keeps burying everybody he's not going to have a company to work for because the merchandise sales, PPV buyrates, house show crowd, television show crowd will all dry up. Doing jobs doesn't hurt anybody's career and the last time I checked this was still a work.

Here's an interesting fact-Triple H has not lost a match (singles, triple threat, tag, or other) by pinfall or submission nor has he been pinned or submitted in a tag team match (his partner was always the one to take the fall) since December 16, 2007 when he was beaten by Jeff Hardy.

Quoted for emphasis.

Trips has no control backstage though. :rolleyes:
 

HHHforever

Active Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2007
Messages
1,350
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
34
Location
Warren, Ohio
Yep these pictures and HHH will single-handely cause the end of the WWE and probably professional wrestling in general. Because nobody buys PPV's, watches shows (especially the ones he's not on) or buys merchandise (particularly the merchandise that isn't his) because of pictures like these and his 5-month title reign. Yup, sounds about right to me.