Live WWE Money in the Bank Discussion Thread - Saturday July 2nd

[Kim Jong Umb]

Swagger wasn't suppose to win mitb that year anyway it was meant for Jeff hardy

 

[Chris]

I get where your coming from, I do lol just personal taste is all

I mean a very reasonable thing would be to have the WINNER be someone to elevate without hamstringing your whole match by not having any former champions lol

 

[Chris]

I think the rumble works best to elevate someone too but I wouldn't be calling for it to not have any former champions (I know this is extreme bc the amount of participants are way higher but I'm being extreme today)

 

[Deezy]

Swagger wasn't suppose to win mitb that year anyway it was meant for Jeff hardy

You mean that fuck up....fucked up?

 

[Kim Jong Umb]

I mean a very reasonable thing would be to have the WINNER be someone to elevate without hamstringing your whole match by not having any former champions lol

Didn't they do the year Cena won that it was all former world champs

 

[Deezy]

I think the rumble works best to elevate someone too but I wouldn't be calling for it to not have any former champions (I know this is extreme bc the amount of participants are way higher but I'm being extreme today)

Sure worked for Sheamus and Nakamura.

 

[Chris]

Didn't they do the year Cena won that it was all former world champs

Yeah, I didn't like that either lol I don't think you need to be assigning pointless qualifiers for your MITB people, just book who you wanna win and then thrown in 5 other dudes that can make the match a banger

 

[Chris]

Sure worked for Sheamus and Nakamura.

Wait but did it not work for Sheamus lol he was champion like that whole year and even had an actual WELL LIKED Big Show feud which shoulda been impossible

 

[Kim Jong Umb]

I think the rumble works best to elevate someone too but I wouldn't be calling for it to not have any former champions (I know this is extreme bc the amount of participants are way higher but I'm being extreme today)

I mean it's not like I'm so far against the idea of former champions that I be turned off the match I just personally like the idea of seeing a fresh new face as the holder

 

[Deezy]

Wait but did it not work for Sheamus lol he was champion like that whole year and even had an actual WELL LIKED Big Show feud which shoulda been impossible

Made Daniel Bryan more if you think about it.

 

[Chris]

I mean it's not like I'm so far against the idea of former champions that I be turned off the match I just personally like the idea of seeing a fresh new face as the holder

The holder is fine, I already said that lol I only found it weird you didn't want the good workers in the match at all bc they'd held the title before.

I think Seth is winning anyway tho so you gonna be mad

 

[Kim Jong Umb]

Sure worked for Sheamus and Nakamura.

that's said at the time the heel turn was shocking and I loved no speak English nakamura the constant peenshesa to aj I could live without

 

[Kim Jong Umb]

The holder is fine, I already said that lol I only found it weird you didn't want the good workers in the match at all bc they'd held the title before.

I think Seth is winning anyway tho so you gonna be mad

I never said they weren't. I suppose you could either a. Have seth win wait for Cody to return have cody win mitb. B. Have Seth win mitb; cody win the rumble and do seth/cody/roman. I do think rock/Roman is plan tho

 

[Swerve]

Seth will probably win.

 

[Cwalker]

The fact that everyone is picking Seth to win means he’s probably not