Lance Armstrong facing new doping charges

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


NovaRoad

Member
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
630
Reaction score
18
Points
18
Age
42
Location
New York
Website
stillskystudio.com
The U.S. Anti-Doping Agency brought formal doping charges against former cyclist Lance Armstrong in an action that could cost him his seven Tour de France titles, according to a letter sent to Armstrong and several others Tuesday.

As a result of the charges, Armstrong has been immediately banned from competition in triathlons, a sport he took up after his retirement from cycling in 2011.

In the 15-page charging letter obtained by The Post, USADA made previously unpublicized allegations against Armstrong, alleging it collected blood samples from Armstrong in 2009 and 2010 that were “fully consistent with blood manipulation including EPO use and/or blood transfusions.†Armstrong has never tested positive.

In February, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles ended a nearly two-year investigation into doping allegations involving Armstrong without bringing criminal charges. Armstrong’s former teammates Floyd Landis and Tyler Hamilton cooperated with federal agents in that investigation and publicly accused Armstrong of doping.

USADA is the quasi-government agency that oversees anti-doping in Olympic sports in the United States. It is empowered to bring charges that could lead to suspension from competition and the rescinding of awards. It does not have authority to bring criminal charges.

“I have never doped, and, unlike many of my accusers, I have competed as an endurance athlete for 25 years with no spike in performance, passed more than 500 drug tests and never failed one,†Armstrong said in a statement released by his publicist. “That USADA ignores this fundamental distinction and charges me instead of the admitted dopers says far more about USADA, its lack of fairness and this vendetta than it does about my guilt or innocence. Any fair consideration of these allegations has and will continue to vindicate me.â€

USADA’s letter, dated June 12, alleges that Armstrong and five former cycling team associates — three doctors including Italian physician Michele Ferrari, one trainer and team manager Johan Bruyneel— engaged in a massive doping conspiracy from 1998 to 2011, and that “the witnesses to the conduct described in this letter include more than ten (10) cyclists . . .â€

All of the six, including trainer Jose Pepi Marti of Switzerland and doctors Pedro Celaya of Luxembourg and Luis Garcia del Moral of Spain, face competition bans. USADA put all of the alleged violations in one letter, it stated, because it considers the six defendents part of a “long running doping conspiracy.â€

The letter specifically alleges that “multiple riders with firsthand knowledge†will testify that Armstrong used EPO, blood transfusions, testosterone and masking agents, and that he distributed and administered drugs to other cyclists from 1998 to 2005. The letter alleges that numerous witnesses will testify that Armstrong also used human growth hormone before 1996.

“These charges are a product of malice and spite and not evidence,†Robert D. Luskin, Armstrong’s Washington-based attorney, said in a telephone interview Wednesday. “Nothing else explains the fact . . . they allege an overarching doping conspiracy among four teams over 14 years and Lance is the only rider that gets charged.â€

Armstrong competed for the U.S. Postal Service team and later the Discovery Channel team from 1998 to 2005. In 2009, he rode for the Astana Cycling Team and on RadioShack’s team in 2010-11.

The letter further claims that Martial Saugy, the director of an anti-doping lab in Switzerland, stated that Armstrong’s urine sample results from the 2001 Tour of Switzerland indicated EPO use.

Saugy told The Post last year that Armstrong’s sample was merely “suspicious,†a designation that meant it could not be called positive. Further analysis with modern methods might bring clarity, Saugy said, but the sample no longer exists.

“We did not do the additional analysis. It will never be sufficient to say, in fact, it was positive,†Saugy said in an interview with The Post. “I will never go in front of a court with that type of thing.â€

Luskin said USADA sent Armstrong a letter last week asking him to meet with anti-doping officials. Armstrong declined, believing USADA was not interested in his testimony but rather a confession, Luskin said. In its letter, USADA said “with the exception of Mr. Armstrong, every other U.S. rider contacted by USADA regarding doping in cycling agreed to meet with USADA . . .â€

USADA Chief Executive Officer Travis Tygart could not be immediately reached to comment.

Though the World Anti-Doping Agency places an eight-year statute of limitations on doping allegations, USADA argues in its letter that evidence of banned acts outside of the eight-year limit can be losed to corroborate evidence within the limit, and the statute of limitations can be waived when the alleged violations were fraudulently concealed.

Armstrong, who won his last Tour title in 2005, has taken up competition in ironman triathlons, and was scheduled to compete in the Ironman France in Nice on June 24.

Credit: Washington Post


Lance "Mellow Johnny" Armstrong has to defend himself yet again.

This is the first I've read that blood samples of his from his return to professional cycling in '09 - '10 showed signs of doping.

I think it's a bit ridiculous at this point. Even the biggest Lance Armstrong haters that I know, people who swear he's the single-best cheater in the history of cycling and would've loved to see him burn at the stake for his transgressions, are over it and just want to move on.
 

Bad News Booty

It’s Ghetto Blaster Time, Fool
Joined
May 22, 2011
Messages
71,555
Reaction score
31,716
Points
138
Age
48
Location
Wherever Your Mom Is
Favorite Wrestler
scotthall
Favorite Wrestler
kevinnash
Favorite Wrestler
hhh
Favorite Wrestler
bigbossman
Favorite Wrestler
randysavage
Favorite Wrestler
nwo
Usada are wasting everyones time....he has never failed a damn thing and a two year federal investigation said he was clear...such horseshit

Sent from my DROID2 GLOBAL using Tapatalk 2
 

NovaRoad

Member
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
630
Reaction score
18
Points
18
Age
42
Location
New York
Website
stillskystudio.com
There are a couple of things I don't like about this, but the thing that bugs me the most is that there's really nothing positive to be gained by the USADA, the UCI (pro cycling's governing body), or the sport as a whole if Armstrong goes down in flames here. This isn't simply about finally arriving at the truth, if he indeed doped and cheated during his days. The USADA has its own agenda.

What are they going to do if his 7 Tour de France victories are stripped? Award the victory to the 2nd place finisher? Most of them were dopers and cheaters too! Check it out, here are the 7 Tours Lance won, and the 2nd place finishers:

  • 1999 - Alex Zulle, caught doper
  • 2000 - Jan Ullrich, caught doper
  • 2001 - Jan Ullrich
  • 2002 - Joseba Beloki, implicated in the biggest doping scandal in modern cycling history and controversially cleared by the Spanish Anti-Doping Agency.
  • 2003 - Jan Ullrich
  • 2004 - Andreas Kloden, alleged doper
  • 2005 - Ivan Basso, implicated in the biggest doping scandal in modern cycling history and admitted to wanting to dope, to making arrangements to dope, but hadn't doped....yet.

Ok, even if you pass over the 2nd place finishers, you'll run in to the same problem with the 3rd place finishers. Most of them were caught or implicated in one way or another too. You'd probably have to go down to the person in 30th place to find the first clean finisher in each of those racers.

That whole generation of cyclists was comprised of dopers, and as much as I like Lance, I'm almost positive he was among them. That said, I think the best thing that they can do is just refer to that 15-16 year time period as the EPO generation, and throw a fat asterisk next to Lance's records.
 

Bad News Booty

It’s Ghetto Blaster Time, Fool
Joined
May 22, 2011
Messages
71,555
Reaction score
31,716
Points
138
Age
48
Location
Wherever Your Mom Is
Favorite Wrestler
scotthall
Favorite Wrestler
kevinnash
Favorite Wrestler
hhh
Favorite Wrestler
bigbossman
Favorite Wrestler
randysavage
Favorite Wrestler
nwo
I am not a fan of cycling but I know what Lance has done for Cancer and other things so that good far outweighs the bad imo....
 

Postman Dave

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
10,061
Reaction score
165
Points
63
Age
35
Location
UK
This is just boring now. Find someone else to pick on for a while.
 

Swamps

Space Cowboy
Joined
May 29, 2011
Messages
17,751
Reaction score
6,246
Points
118
Location
Snake Mountain
Favorite Sports Team
WrE8t1L
Favorite Sports Team
HHst8yg
Favorite Sports Team
lurU13l
Favorite Sports Team
ceaRtck
I guess the haters are always going to hate… Mr. Armstrong is an outstanding athlete and an even better humanitarian. The man’s work with cancer has been nothing less than phenomenal, and has done a lot more on his own freewill than most people would do if they were forced.

The USADA is nothing but garbage. Its ridiculous the limitations and laws they try to implement on supplementation. Now, I am a die hard supporter of supplementations and think the damn government should back off of a man’s right to put whatever he wants to in his body for enhancement. If someone knows what they’re doing with supplements, then he or she will not have negative effects. It really annoys me reading when someone is blaming a supplement for, his or her, own ignorance. Too many times has a supplement been banned because of ignorant claims by irresponsible people. Anyway, I’m going to stop with this mini rant…