phantomgerald
Guest
It'll lead to a nuclear building spree and it could lead to a nuclear war if the people who are in charge are not rational enough to think about the consequences.
-
Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!
I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
It'll lead to a nuclear building spree and it could lead to a nuclear war if the people who are in charge are not rational enough to think about the consequences.
That's what people thought about the Russians and the Americans. Ever heard of MAD? That's what keeps teh peace with nuclear weapons. Besides. One country can't have nukes and say to another no you can't have them. That's plain wrong. A country should be able to defend themselves appropriately agains these weaposn else they sit above that country like the proverbial Sword of Damocles.
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2007
- Messages
- 976
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 16
- Age
- 32
- Location
- Montreal, Quebec, Canada
The real question is: will she be a good president? or will she just menstruate all over the country?
the dark knight
Guest
dont get me wrong. i said the woman has to be extremely exceptional. you cant just let evil creatures who live for jealousy and pain...please, dont get me started on my opinion about women...
Travis40
Guest
I think that there could be a woman president and I'm by no means racist...but I don't want Obama in the White House...I'd rather have Hillary (someone who's already been there and knows the basics) run the country than someone that looks like someone we're at war with...I'm just hoping that the best person suited for the job wins it...and I'll be happy.
CenaMark54
Guest
How did Bush make us a target for terrorism. The 911 attacks were planned well before Bush took office and there haven't been any attacks on the US since. If anything you should be praising Bush for finally taking a stand abainst terrorist organizations. It may be hard to beleive but terrorism has been a problem since before Bush was elected.
If anything, you can blame Bill Clinton for his light stance on terrorist organizations. Hell even Reagan shares some of that blame for siding with Terrorist groups during the end of the Cold War.
Back to the topic at hand. The US is ready for a female President, just not Hillary Clinton. If you think Bush is bad wait for all the lying, blackmailing and coverups that go on with another Clinton in office. Its freightening.
If anything, you can blame Bill Clinton for his light stance on terrorist organizations. Hell even Reagan shares some of that blame for siding with Terrorist groups during the end of the Cold War.
Back to the topic at hand. The US is ready for a female President, just not Hillary Clinton. If you think Bush is bad wait for all the lying, blackmailing and coverups that go on with another Clinton in office. Its freightening.
I think a female president would be a good thing but not HRC. I dont like her, I don't like her politics and I would much rather see someone else be the first woman present, someone to set the bar higher. That being said, if Obama is her VP, I am voting for them because not only do I like Obama as a person, he's one of a scant few politicains who doesnt have his head up his ass and its about damn time one of my people got into the White House!
phantomgerald
Guest
the dark knight
Guest
1st time i hear that....:g:
10 men out of 100 can rule a country.
1 woman out of 10000 can rule a country.
that was my point..