Jim Ross speaks on The Undertaker's future in the WWE.

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Jon Honcho

Member
Joined
May 2, 2010
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
39
Location
In a house
Lesnar, Orton, Cena and Kane.

Kurt Angle, The Rock, and even Hulk Hogan in mid-2002 made Brock a real star.

Once again, Angle, Booker T, Big Show, and others helped make Cena a bigger star in 2004.

Evolution and Mick Foley made Orton. No one made Kane because he sucks.
 
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
2,923
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
41
Location
Badstreet, USA
^^ That's bogus to say Hogan, Angle and Rock did more to make Lesnar than Taker, they laid down once, Taker like twice and put Lesnar over HUGE in a HIAC, with a broken hand. Had he not wanted to make Brock, he could have half assed that match and had a legitimate reason to have done so, instead he put on the best match of Brock's career to that point.That match cemented Brock as the top dude on SD! MONTHS before Angle would even touch the guy. So I really don't understand what Angle did to make Brock besides having a great Iron Man match with him when he was already established.

Taker played a huge role in making Orton. Orton was over, indeed, but Evolution put him on the map, they didn't make him, if anything they killed his momentum with Trips squashing him for the WHC, then he floundered for a bit. Foley was his best "Legend Killer" feud, but he was still viewed as a mid card threat at best. His feud with Taker finally got him to that upper-mid card status they wanted to get him a year before. Taker did alot there. And Cena???!! Taker was the cat who put Orton in the position to be a threat to Cena.

No one made Kane because he sucks.
I don't think you know what you're talking about. Did you see Kane's entrance into the WWF in 97? People were legit scared of this guy, not just because he was squashing fucks left and right, but because of how Taker was bowing out to him at every turn. It was the fear that Taker showed to him that really made him a legit threat, as Taker had never showed any sort of fear.
 

chessarmy

Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
431
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
33
Taker should stick around as long as his body allows him, he's someone the WWE won't be able to replace and it would be a huge loss if he left. With that said, I only think Taker has 2 years max left in him, if thats true, I only hope his retirement match is as good as both his Mania matches with HBK

If he wants to stick around for another couple years, fine. Give him someone you want to groom as the next big star and let him have a long running feud that culminates in a few great matches spaced out over the course of a year.


Drew-03.jpg
 

...god...

Active Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2010
Messages
1,671
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
34
Lesnar, Orton, Cena and Kane.
Rofl. He didn't MOLD any of those stars. Lesnar was already 'molded' and got the ultimate put over and send off from the one of the greatest stars of all time. Orton? Are you serious? No one has hurt Orton's more career more than Undertaker except possibly Hogan. Cena, he gave somewhat of a rub, didn't 'mold' him though, basically AirFixx already covered it. How exactly did he do anything for Kane except bury him further down the card each time he lost to him? Sure, in his debut he had some good momentum, but that was for a good nice few months. You know last time Kane was relevant? Oh, when he was jobbing to Undertaker at Wrestlemania. After that he fell into complete obscurity to what we see now, JUST LIKE EVERY OTHER OPPONENT UNDERTAKER FACES AT WRESTLEMANIA WHO ISN'T ALREADY IN THE MAIN EVENT/HOLDING THE TITLE (aside from the obvious Triple H and Shawn Michaels).

IMO the nearest he's come to doing anything close to 'building' since Orton in '05 was Kennedy, but they had him on that run where he was beating former world champs so he was pretty credible regardless.
My thoughts exactly. Kennedy was actually looking fucking GREAT vs. Taker. No 'broken hand' bullshit or anything involved to protect him. Btw, Undertaker did fine to not like completely unstoppable back in the ABA days. It was only after he returned in 2004 that he's been a piece of shit that hasn't done anything for anyone and is by far the most protected and unstoppable force in the WWE. He's not as annoying as Cena because he's not around as much.
 

MizMasta3000

Active Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
2,520
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
30
"The Deadman will never get to the point to where he never leaves his feet and people merely run into his fist. Ugh."

Poor JR forgot about CM Punk when he said this.