Jim Ross speaks on The Undertaker's future in the WWE.
- Thread starter straight_edge76
- Start date
-
Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!
I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2010
- Messages
- 88
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 6
- Age
- 45
I should be glad that he won't be retiring soon, but to me it's always a thing to be a little sad about, that he'll never fight HBK again.
The best part of this was him indirectly taking a shot at Hogan:
"The Deadman will never get to the point to where he never leaves his feet and people merely run into his fist. Ugh"
:roflmao:
"The Deadman will never get to the point to where he never leaves his feet and people merely run into his fist. Ugh"
:roflmao:
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2010
- Messages
- 88
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 6
- Age
- 45
Oh yeah that's right! Why in hell did I miss that?
I think that's also a plus side on HBK retirig. At least now they won't have a match like Hogan VS Shawn at Summerslam,
I think that's also a plus side on HBK retirig. At least now they won't have a match like Hogan VS Shawn at Summerslam,
You never would see HBK act that way with Undertaker. Taker is a professional & doesn't mind putting people over, unlike Hogan. Hogan definitely deserved the match he got because he was incredibly unprofessional in wanting to be put over & not doing rematches like the original plans for the feud were.
Don't you mean "Taker doesn't care about being put over people, unlike Hogan." or "Taker cares about putting people over, unlike Hogan."? As you have it written, it's a contradiction.
The way I see it - Taker is already on a limited schedule, so the next step is retirement. If he wants to stick around for another couple years, fine. Give him someone you want to groom as the next big star and let him have a long running feud that culminates in a few great matches spaced out over the course of a year or so. Something similar to Taz calling out Sabu for a year until they finally meet at Barely Legal.
If you have him return only to face off against someone who's already semi-high profile, you're wasting an opportunity to have Taker mold a new star.
What star has Taker EVER molded. Why would he do it now..
0 proof in this statement.
^^^Cena???? WDF?
Key moments in the building of Cena (IMO)...
Debut's and holds his own against Kurt.
FU's Big SHow @ WM20
Beats JBL for the title @ WM21
Angle & Jericho job for him for remainder of year
HHH jobs for him @ WM22....
I don't see much, if any, significance in their throwaway title match.
Key moments in the building of Cena (IMO)...
Debut's and holds his own against Kurt.
FU's Big SHow @ WM20
Beats JBL for the title @ WM21
Angle & Jericho job for him for remainder of year
HHH jobs for him @ WM22....
I don't see much, if any, significance in their throwaway title match.
Pfft. Good ridance I say. The less I have see him make his big return after Mania and burry the current champ, the better.
Cena's questionable, but the others were years ago. Lesnar 02, Orton was what 02 03, Kane, sometime in the 90's. I wont say he hasn't molded anyone, but for it to happen almost a decade ago? Somethings not right.
CM Punk immediately springs to mind.
Crushed upon Taker's return from holidaying in Death Valley. :sigh:
IMO the nearest he's come to doing anything close to 'building' since Orton in '05 was Kennedy, but they had him on that run where he was beating former world champs so he was pretty credible regardless.