Is Vince using his Part-time guys enough or too little?

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Wang Chung

Cowboy Shit
Joined
Jan 5, 2012
Messages
21,232
Reaction score
4,022
Points
138
Age
48
Location
Dancing
Favorite Wrestler
machoman
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles2
Favorite Wrestler
nwo
Favorite Wrestler
boots2asses
Favorite Sports Team
XifccX1
Favorite Sports Team
yFSlVcD
Well since [MENTION=1]Zod[/MENTION] and I started this discussion in the betting section. I figured it would be a decent topic to discuss.


The Part-time Cast:

Rock
Lesnar
HBK
SCSA
HHH- Wrestling wise
Undertaker-Mania only because of his age and injuries.



We were somewhat discussing the streak over there when Zod said he would rather Vince create some new stars instead of allowing the Streak to continue. Thus causing the reaction of well its the same as bringing in the other guys to boost a PPV buyrate and interest in it.


What are your thoughts on this. As much as I would like to see Taker ride off in the sunset soon (I mean really soon), how about the other guys that have come and gone from time to time?
 

Smart Marx

Israel Has the Right to Exist
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
179,245
Reaction score
37,596
Points
148
Age
38
Location
Wrestling Forums
Website
wrestlingsmarks.com
Favorite Wrestler
emma
Favorite Wrestler
YA1yyED
Favorite Wrestler
frmoJZU
Favorite Wrestler
nock3cf
Favorite Wrestler
danielbryan3
Favorite Wrestler
tLCb5kv
Favorite Sports Team
WYT3shw
Favorite Sports Team
fRXTMaD
Favorite Sports Team
LechI0u
Favorite Sports Team
RHZ7KJg
Well since @Zod and I started this discussion in the betting section. I figured it would be a decent topic to discuss.


The Part-time Cast:

Rock
Lesnar
HBK
SCSA
HHH- Wrestling wise
Undertaker-Mania only because of his age and injuries.



We were somewhat discussing the streak over there when Zod said he would rather Vince create some new stars instead of allowing the Streak to continue. Thus causing the reaction of well its the same as bringing in the other guys to boost a PPV buyrate and interest in it.


What are your thoughts on this. As much as I would like to see Taker ride off in the sunset soon (I mean really soon), how about the other guys that have come and gone from time to time?
I don't think having Undertaker work one match a year and ALWAYS get put over is the same as bringing in part time talent.

A lot of those part timers as you call them put over other guys. It's not about boosting themselves up, but the business.

I'm not a big fan Dwayne but he did put Cena over on his last way out, and Lesnar jobbed to Cena and Triple H.

I personally think WWE should find a way to use Lesnar on a more permanent basis because the man is a true gift to the ring.

Triple H is perfect in his role though. He needs to only come back to the ring if it'll help pop a buy and put someone over. He's doing quite well at his role.
 

Wang Chung

Cowboy Shit
Joined
Jan 5, 2012
Messages
21,232
Reaction score
4,022
Points
138
Age
48
Location
Dancing
Favorite Wrestler
machoman
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles2
Favorite Wrestler
nwo
Favorite Wrestler
boots2asses
Favorite Sports Team
XifccX1
Favorite Sports Team
yFSlVcD
I don't think Vince is willing to pay Lesnar what he wants to appear more and I think Lesnar only wants the short term angles ATM because of the abuse he took from MMA and his illness.

I think Dwayne is signed on for another match or two too. So as long as he jobs to some of the current guys I am definitely fine with it.

I would even be fine with Vince bringing in Jake the Snake for a few matches and a nice match or two for Scott Hall when he is finally healed up from his surgery.

I get the feeling we will be seeing a lot of HHH for awhile as I think his role with Orton will be a predominate one.