I don't want to advocate the use of a lame-duck GM.
However, it seems to me that the Authority have booked themselves into somewhat of a corner
HHH can defeat and outsmart any wrestler on the entire roster. Where's the intrigue?
Stephanie's power is one thing, but society frowns on men disparaging women in any way. She's untouchable.
This creates an extremely lopsided dichotomy where the Authority is almost immune to any backlash, whatsoever.
Think of it as a see-saw where the Authority's leverage outweighs the entire WWE roster combined.
This creates very little drama. It undermines top-tier talent and causes a stalemate in storylines.
Does anybody else think the Authority needs a chink in the armor, something that makes them vulnerable?
Having Laurinaitis or Maddox at least created the illusion of extreme vulnerability. Opinions?
However, it seems to me that the Authority have booked themselves into somewhat of a corner
HHH can defeat and outsmart any wrestler on the entire roster. Where's the intrigue?
Stephanie's power is one thing, but society frowns on men disparaging women in any way. She's untouchable.
This creates an extremely lopsided dichotomy where the Authority is almost immune to any backlash, whatsoever.
Think of it as a see-saw where the Authority's leverage outweighs the entire WWE roster combined.
This creates very little drama. It undermines top-tier talent and causes a stalemate in storylines.
Does anybody else think the Authority needs a chink in the armor, something that makes them vulnerable?
Having Laurinaitis or Maddox at least created the illusion of extreme vulnerability. Opinions?