BaraaKhalaf92 said:
How? Stopping him backstage would still halt his momentum on screen. better to give the fans an on screen explanation instead of leaving us with loop holes.
Is HHH really an ego maniac?
- Thread starter BaraaKhalaf92
- Start date
-
Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!
I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
How? Stopping him backstage would still halt his momentum on screen. better to give the fans an on screen explanation instead of leaving us with loop holes.
Jose Tortilla said:Yeah. Dude, you need to stop looking at WWE through CM Punk-glasses. You need to watch the product with Business-glasses to understand the full concept, outcomes, etc..
I'm a big, big, HHH fan, but I agreed on Brock going over him to make Brock look strong as hell.
Now do you agree on HHH going over Brock at WM?
I am the only one that matters in my world, welcome to WWEF, where we comment using opinions with a common bias.
HHH > Punk, and a lot of people have lost worse matches. That is how the backstage game works.
HHH > Punk, and a lot of people have lost worse matches. That is how the backstage game works.
BaraaKhalaf92 said:
I'm not Jose but I'll answer for myself. Yes.
It's an unfinished story which has painted Lesnar as a foreign invader. H getting his comeuppance and perhaps a legit retirement match whilst banishing a big and hostile foe sounds like good story telling. With the circumstances that we have I agree with it. No one else on the current roster should face Brock because Brock doesn't have enough dates on his schedule to build a good feud with anyone else.
Stopspot said:
there are rumors that they are planning to extend his contact, if he lose at WM and then extend it, he won't have any momentum left...
Stopspot said:
True, people complain about how HHH going over people doesn't help at all but OK, Brock went over HHH, Heyman said he was the man on the following Raw and what else we got? Of course no one complains about it on the Internet because HHH lost and it made the IWC happy and stuff, but so far Lesnar going over Triple H has been the same it would've been if the opposite happened, minus the IWC complaints. I don't really see them using Brock to put a full time star over anyway.
:umad:
BaraaKhalaf92 said:
Which is the beauty of pro wrestling. It is re written constantly. If they resign Brock (unlikely) then I don't think Hunter will be afraid to take the pin or win in a controversial way so as to lengthen and expand the story.
HHH going over Punk didn't really damage Punk because look at him now, he is the number 2 guy and top villain, with the company behind him. He just had to have some backstage attitude beat out of him, which with a guy like Punk most likely has to be done in ring since he is a quick witted little rascal.
Leo C said:
I don't like Brock either, I think he is a money hungry bastard that doesn't give a damn about the business, I only wanted him to win at SS because I thought it will build his momentum in order to face Undertaker at WM....
What was the point of his return if the only MAIN feud he had was with a part timer who only wrestles like or 3 times a year?
They could have used it 10000 times better..
BaraaKhalaf92 said:
Sure. Brock doens't give a shit about WWE. He only cares about money, and him looking good in the spotlight.
So HHH going over is the perfect fit. Fans will love it, it's good for business, it's good for ratings, etc...
As long as it's a good match.