Is EC3 the real deal?

[Lover Boy]

I think people have known for a while what a fantastic heel EC3 is but lately he has somehow improved even further. Right now, in my opinion he is one of the top heels in both WWE and TNA. His mic work is nothing short of brilliant, he has a natural gift for talking on the mic which a lot of people don't have. He seems to be able to flow and go against the crowd which is always great to see.

The problem with EC3 is his ring skills. I am not saying that he is bad in the ring as he's pretty good but he isn't amazing. Do you guys think that this could damage him a lot? Or do you think that his mic skills are good enough to take him too the top?

 

[Austin Bates]

EC3 is a pretty good heel in TNA. I think he could improve in all areas of his game from talking to wrestling, but he is still a good heel. I think he will be taken to the top and not because of his matches, but because of his talking.


YES!

 

[Mitch Buchannon]

He's a lot like Miz in 2010, great mic work but really never the reason why his matches are good. Not knocking his ring skills, but he's definitely not the best in-ring worker.

 

[t4terrific]

He's a lot like Miz in 2010, great mic work but really never the reason why his matches are good. Not knocking his ring skills, but he's definitely not the best in-ring worker.

He is head and shoulders better than Miz on the mat. His character is more obnoxious too.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Lover Boy]

I don't think he's that much better than the Miz in the ring.

The Miz is pretty solid and can put on good matches with most people, it's just the little things he seems to miss out on.

I suppose one of the reasons EC3s matches aren't always great is the undefeated streak, it's in his characters nature to be slimy and sneak a win through underhand tactics rather than good wrestling.