- Joined
- Feb 11, 2012
- Messages
- 15,948
- Reaction score
- 3,135
- Points
- 0
- Location
- Nashville, TN
- Website
- i.imgur.com
Wait, aren't these a whole bunch of Slammiversary rematches on free TV?
Think TNA put far more effort into impact than their PPVs at this point because the Spike TV deal is the only thing keeping them going. Only 1 of the last 6 world title changes have happened on PPV.
You're absolutely right, and I agree it's the right business plan. Just have that cliche' stuck in my mind, haha.
They still haven't resigned with Spike so priority #1 is that they get back in favor with the Network, so they do need to do everything possible to produce the best TV they can. Besides, it's not like PPV is important to this company. More people stream PPV's than buy them (especially for TNA) and that's caused the WWE to change their entire business model, and that change has made TNA's model even more obsolete.
Don't see why they bother doing them anymore.
Getting resigned with Spike would be awesome, because apparently it's not even really free TV if it's part of a package deal so TNA will get more money if Impact's are doing good. Heck, I love PPVs because of the big event feel but maybe if they could make them big special TV events with Spike, available to rewatch by paying and maybe even a PPV pre-show.
Wait, aren't these a whole bunch of Slammiversary rematches on free TV?