Hitler would have made a great Roman Emperor. He knew that the people needed bread and circuses to distract them from their daily existences. He also knew that he needed to keep the military strong and active to keep it happy. And he knew when he needed to be loved and, possibly more importantly, when he needed to be feared. Most people today can't imagine that anyone could have ever respected and loved Hitler, but the truth is that he was loved and respected before he was feared. It was only after the war had drug on for a few years (much longer than he had promised it would take and much longer than it had initially appeared the war would take...remember, France fell only a few months after the invasion of Poland; it was literally Great Britain alone against the Third Reich) that he had to start using the "rule through fear" approach with his own citizens (he wasn't worried about being loved in the occupied territories, as he didn't believe the people there were part of his "master race").
Unfortunately, for Germany, Hitler, and the rest of the world, Hitler also had the great failing of many Roman Emperors, particularly the later Roman Emperors, in that his ideal society was not one based on morality but one based on an idealized reality that would lead to a lot of deaths in order to be achieved (much like Nero, Caligula, etc.). In his particular case, this would lead to the deaths of Jews, African-heritaged peoples/Blacks, homosexuals, communists, Freemasons (it wasn't just your people, Faarooq), Slavs, Gypsies, and a bunch more I can't remember on a sunny Saturday afternoon.
Hitler's other major weakness was his own fear. What you have to remember is that those who rule through fear do so because they have so much fear themselves. He was afraid that these groups would poison his perfect society and master race, either racially, socially, or politically. And he didn't believe, in the end, that Germans had the moral strength to deny these other groups on their own, so they must be eliminated.
wk