HQ Posts

[BaraaKhalaf92]

Now seriously, what's your definition of HQ and LQ posts?

I mean, forums are always about opinions, no one is right and no one is wrong, it's just a matter of discussion...

Someone may say "hey Cena is the best ever",and someone else may say "Cena is a failure" , both have their own opinions and you can't say that one's post is a HQ or LQ..

How?
How do you judge that that particular poster has HQ posts?

 

[Saylor]

It's more the quality of the post. If you don't add discussion or relevancy that's pretty much a LQ post furthermore adding something to the discussion with your opinion and knowledge in my eyes is a HQ post. You don't have to write paragraphs and paragraphs - it's all about the quality of the post with relevant information.

 

[Danielson]

@"lady deathbane" ^ :ksi:

 

[Lady Deathbane]

@"lady deathbane" ^ :ksi:

:

 

[Danielson]

:

By the way, the last two posts are prime examples of LQ, but i've contrbuted by showing you what not to do to be considered LQ, therefore making my post extremely educational, thus HQ.

 

[Lady Deathbane]

By the way the last two posts are prime examples of LQ, but i've contrbuted by showing you what not to do to be considered LQ, therefore making my post extremely educational, thus HQ.

Nah, you're just LQ. ipebomb:

 

[Senhor Perfect]

Danny is the H-est Q possible.

 

[Danielson]

Nah, you're just LQ. ipebomb:

Pushed Wayyyyyy too early

 

[Danielson]

Danny is the H-est Q possible.

@"lady deathbane"

 

[Lady Deathbane]

@"lady deathbane"

Look at all these irrelevant opinions. 1:

 

[Danielson]

Look at all these irrelevant opinions. 1:

OP, just keep watching what she posts next. LQ as can be.

 

[Senhor Perfect]

Look at all these irrelevant opinions. 1:

I see :sad: