How Would you make WWE '13 better?

[Donald Trump_]

Really big. Throughout his career, Kane has been a victim of horrible booking.

That would have been a dream come true. To see Kane be recognized as the GOAT. Undertaker's good but Kane is the true monster of the WWE.

 

[Leo C]

That would have been a dream come true. To see Kane be recognized as the GOAT. Undertaker's good but Kane is the true monster of the WWE.

Kane's pretty good, I like him.

 

[Rysenberg]

The reason Undertaker is and always will be better than Kane is because he is/was a hell of a lot more talented than him.

 

[seabs]

What R'Albin said tbh, Kane was given a shit gimmick with a monster initial push and made it into a midcard act. Taker was given a shit gimmick and became an icon with it. Kane's great but ever going to have the charisma or flexibility of Taker? No IMO.

 

[Leo C]

Taker is indeed better than Kane. Kane's good, but Taker's better, at least inside the ring.

 

[Farooq]

Undertaker can beat Kane easily in the ring, but Kane's gimmick is a little better then Undertaker, with the mask that is....but this guy can pwn both of them any time of the week.

Spoiler

 

[Crayo]

Did I see someone say Kane's gimmick is better than Taker's? :haha:

 

[Donald Trump_]

Undertaker = Wrestler.
Kane = Monster.

 

[Crayo]

:facepalm1:

need more facepalm smilies.

 

[Farooq]

Make this one a facepalm smilie

 

[Leo C]

OK.

 

[Donald Trump_]

OK.

My fellow Kane-a-nite Leo C agrees. Seriously though. Kane's gimmick with the mask and the fire makes him more of a monster. But of course WWE fu*ked that up. Kane had so much potential.

 

[Crayo]

Leo was saying he's making the smiley I think, not agreeing lol. I agree, Kane's gimmick was good at first when no one saw his face, but Taker arguably has the greatest gimmick of all time.

 

[Leo C]

The OK indicated I was going to do this.

@[Crayo] @[Farooq]

But it depends. What's the best gimmick? I like both. Now who's the biggest monster? It depends, Kane has always been booked more like a monster, like a destroyer, Undertaker has been booked differently... he's more like a Deadman, really. The guy no sells tons of offence and all, you know? The gimmicks are relatively different. I'd say Kane's been booked like a monster more often, Undertaker has as well, but he's been booked as a face for more time (probably because he's been in WWE for longer), not sure how to explain.

 

[Crayo]

Added.

:facepalm :

Epic stuff.