AJ styles vs HHH would of been more entertaining than this lukewarm feud he is having to Jericho. At least AJ's for defeat could of been against HHH for the title on a PPV instead of Y2J on a episode of Smackdown. And I don't why this would HAVE to be a Wrestlemania event either. They already have a bigger main event for Fastlane then they are planning for Mania (HHH vs Reigns). Plus I definitely think it's dumb to have Triple H win the title, not compete in 1 big match where he goes over, and then just drop the belt at Mania. It looks so weak. And actually yeah Sting vs HHH probably should of happened at TLC because their match was fuckin shitty anyways, Taker vs Sting would of been better.
I never said this has to be a WrestleMania event. My point being, that having a sudden feud between the two biggest stars in the industry, right now, would be stupid. It has no rational purpose. There's no background or basis, justifying nothing. Not to mention having AJ Styles (a relative nobody to a casual WWE fan) lose to Triple H (a legend to a casual WWE fan) would just make him look weak. It will nail a tombstone on his WWE run, before anything even happened. I strongly disagree with AJ Styles loss to Chris Jericho, but that's a safer bet to lose to. Daniel Bryan had his first loss to Chris Jericho, and it made little impact on his run. Coming in as a "big signing" but losing to an established legend, has never worked. Look at Curtis Axel: He came in with hype, and got a not-so convincing win on Triple H, and was pushed to Superstars by the end of the year.
Also lol @ you saying Sting "The man who nearly coughs up his lungs, in every match" vs. Undertaker "The man who nearly died the year prior" would've been better than him facing Triple H. Yeah their match sucked, but having Sting vs. The Undertaker wouldn't have been worse.
