Heyman talks on TNA/WWE

[Evil Austin]

The Heyman Hustle has posted Paul Heyman's latest editorial where he discusses WWE and TNA's failure to find fresh, young talent to groom into the "stars of tomorrow".

"When it comes to a young talent initiative, both World Wrestling Entertainment and TNA Wrestling have their collective heads shoved up their respective asses," Heyman bluntly states, "...a really talented lap dancer has a better chance of being discovered and recruited into professional wrestling than a decorated athlete who is trying to decide between WWE/TNA and UFC/MMA".

Heyman definitely doesn't hold back in his criticism for the two organizations.

-- There is a link to the full blog on Wrestlezone if you guys want

Heyman has always been the words of wisdom and he has really always known what to do and what not to do just to bad he doesn't have the finance to have his own company.

 

[He who knows more than Nation]

Heyman is the BEST at making anyone look good, no matter how deficient they could be in a certain area. He knows what he's talking about here. Fuck working for TNA or the E, he should go visit RoH and have Adam Pierce thrown the fuck out and rework some of that magic from that scrappy indy that spurned the wrestling movement of the 90s.

 

[CenaMark54]

About 6 months ago, Heyman praised the WWE for pushing young talent like Orton, Punk, Morrison, Miz, and Swagger.

I don;t get it, how is the WWE not finding and pushing young stars when two of those guys he mentioned are the current world champs.

The WWE is pretty much set for the next 8 to 10 years with Orton, Cena, Punk, Edge, and Jeff Hardy. Not to mention, every 5 years or so, the WWE has a tremendous track record of handpicking new stars to take the place of old ones. I'm not sure what the issue is?

 

[The Rated R CMStar]

Hell, it wasn't even 6 months ago Cenamark, the column praising the push of CM Punk was about 2 months ago, and the one about Orton 4.

I agree, people tend to overreact when talking about "WWE's same ol' main eventers, subject with I always get a nice laugh. Edge only has had 3 solid years as main eventer, Jeff Hardy only one, and on Smackdown CM Punk has became a main eventer at last. Then again, somehow, WWE always has the same main eventers.

Orton and Cena are a lock to be when 2014 (since that's the date Heyman chose), and I predict that they will be so damn over that they can book Cena vs X midcarder and people will buy the midcarder as main eventer. I didn't say Edge because his injuries might end his career sooner, but i do think he'll last 5 more years. Hardy is bound to come back eventually. Swagger and Morrison by then will be main eventers. CM Punk will have been pushed to the moon by then.

Oh, and somehow I still think Triple H will be around by that year.

 

[the dark knight]

triple h will never retiiire!

 

[Soulpower]

Edge, and Jeff Hardy.

Not so sure about these two. Edge has always been injury prone (Which could eventually shorten his career), and Jeff... Well, he's Jeff, so you never know what he's going to do.

 

[chessarmy]

TNA is really the only guilty one here, I think WWE's done a faily good job of pushing some new talent over the past few years. TNA however, well, thats a completely different story. They feel the need to job Amazing Red (who could be TNA's answer to Evan Bourne) to Grandpa Nash, it makes me sick

 

[MikeRaw]

Evil Austin, when I told you I haven't watched wrestling is a while, you said I should read this blog to make me get back into it. Lmao. If anything, I'm less interested now. cause it's true. It's basically the same old shit.

 

[Next Big Thing]

Heyman has always been the words of wisdom and he has really always known what to do and what not to do

If this were true, don't you think ECW would still be around right now?

 

[He who knows more than Nation]

^^^^isappointed_anim:

It didn't go out of business due to the man's booking ability, it went out of business because of the man's book keeping ability.