Hell in a Cell Hell in the Cell 2014 Poster

[Prince Bálor]

It's fine. PPV shouldn't even exist.

Yeah, it's been shit for years and lost the gist of it. The PPV's name is HIAC, and usually only 1 match is held in it. WTF? Cancel HIAC and Battleground and even Payback. There's no need to be a PPV every month. I'm pretty sure it'd make the product better.

 

[Leo C]

Yeah, it's been shit for years and lost the gist of it. The PPV's name is HIAC, and usually only 1 match is held in it. WTF? Cancel HIAC and Battleground and even Payback. There's no need to be a PPV every month. I'm pretty sure it'd make the product better.

Yeah. I'm not sure it would make the product better by default (hello TNA) but it's definitely a step in the right direction, but seriously, having a HIAC PPV in particular just sucks. Kills the stipulation.

 

[Prince Bálor]

Yeah. I'm not sure it would make the product better by default (hello TNA) but it's definitely a step in the right direction, but seriously, having a HIAC PPV in particular just sucks. Kills the stipulation.

Sure, I totally agree with your post. And yeah, it doesn't mean that it'd make the product better by default... But, let's be honest, TNA's been kicking WWE's ass for the majority of 2014.

I, for one, would not have a problem had they cut off PPVs like Payback, HIAC and Battleground.

 

[Leo C]

Sure, I totally agree with your post. And yeah, it doesn't mean that it'd make the product better by default... But, let's be honest, TNA's been kicking WWE's ass for the majority of 2014.

I, for one, would not have a problem had they cut off PPVs like Payback, HIAC and Battleground.

Problem with TNA is not really quality, it's how PPVs have affected quality. Theoretically they'd have longer builds, but they just build them on the last 4~3 weeks anyway (or in BFG's case don't build it at all), so the PPVs are not much for TNA, it's what I meant (also, until Slammi the product just sucked. Did get better afterwards).