Does that mean you would have voted for me had you read the things or what?Big Hoss Rambler said:Voted to tie it up.
Cryptic message, @[Big Hoss Rambler]?
Does that mean you would have voted for me had you read the things or what?Big Hoss Rambler said:Voted to tie it up.
Jonathan said:Does that mean you would have voted for me had you read the things or what?
Cryptic message, @[Big Hoss Rambler]?
Don't worry about it, was just wondering what you meant :wink:Big Hoss Rambler said:I clicked the spoiler and I was like
Just voted to tie it up. No hard feelings.
Thank you very much, TheNova! Much appreciated!TheNova said:Voted Jonathan. Better read in my opinion.
Good luck to both.
Thewindyfan said:If this is head booker, why do we need the lavish writing style to be shown. I mean the booker role is for someone to book something good in a short and sweet manner for the writers to illustrate. Bookers just plan out but the details weren't necessary as they won't be needing to worry about doing that when one of them are head booker.
This basically, it's always good to see who can do what also, so then if they input to the creative team, you can see what's what before-hand.seabs said:The head booker judges whether a piece of work is good enough basically, so if they can't write a segment how can they judge somebody elses?
seabs said:The head booker judges whether a piece of work is good enough basically, so if they can't write a segment how can they judge somebody elses?
Zamorakian said:Damn i'm losing...
Thewindyfan said:I really wanted to vote for you though because you'res was good but then I read that I can't take back votes :S