I watched Hogan/Warrior for the first time in forever last year. Thought it started out about as perfectly as it could have and also had a great ending. the meat of the match wasn't blowing me away but I still get why the match does it for people. I think I'm of the opinion that there's a great 12 minute match in the 23 minutes somewhere. I've become a bigger fan of 85-87 Hogan than I could have ever assumed I'd be. During those few years he had loads more good matches - with a pretty wide variety of opponents - than people give him credit for, and all of the matches I favour from him during those years cap it off pretty short.
Most of what I felt during Bull/Aja was that I wish it wasn't escape the cage rules. To quote my own butt from my thread in reviews and columns - "I also really don't think this benefitted from escape the cage rules at all. These two do the Stand And Fight thing well so having them to dash against the action to climb away never looked right to me." While I also had some issues with the tag, I wound up voting for Bull/Bison vs. Kong/Grizzly at #23 because I liked the structure and individual stand out moments much, much more. I totally understand the cage as a wild spectacle that glues peoples' eyes to the screen though and I get it being this high.
I'm very curious about the final four because I can only think of three matches that would for sure be left, two of which I had high on my own list. The last one is just escaping me.