General Chit-Chat Thread - No Spoilers

[Samoa Looch]

Or make it two rings and basically have two Rumble matches go on at the same time... every minute someone joins, but it's two minutes per ring

 

[O-Blaze]

Because the time it takes one person, 3 people come out

 

[Dmac]

An opinion is wrong? I think they're too long now.

 

[Chris]

Or make it two rings and basically have two Rumble matches go on at the same time... every minute someone joins, but it's two minutes per ring

Why didn't WCW think of this in 95

 

[O-Blaze]

An opinion is wrong? I think they're too long now.

the way you was wondering it as if it would be longer lol

 

[Samoa Looch]

Why didn't WCW think of this in 95

 

[O-Blaze]

Because you wanted two at a time …. Which doesn’t change the time of it from now

 

[O-Blaze]

If it stays 90

 

[Samoa Looch]

I can see why people don't like the length of the Rumbles if they are bad/boringly booked

 

[Chris]

Just got my March 31 and April 1 time off request approved for rasslin' festivities gonna be an amazing birthday weekend

 

[O-Blaze]

Like if I’m doing the math right in my head. 2 at a time means 60 is out there at the time it takes 30.

 

[Dmac]

Two at a time would add to the excitement it wouldn't shorten it timewise no but wouldn't make it any longer either. Them being too long was intended as a separate point because they already are.

 

[O-Blaze]

Two at a time would add to the excitement it wouldn't shorten it timewise no but wouldn't make it any longer either. Them being too long was intended as a separate point because they already are.

and at 30 seconds it shorter as they get one extra out there in the 90 second frame.. 3 other than 2…

 

[Samoa Looch]

Just have them all out right from the start

 

[O-Blaze]

The excitement thing sure.. but I don’t want two themes playing at a time