I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
I think Lesnar was the perfect choice leadin' up for his initial loss and 50/50 bookin'. The Lesnar win over Taker put him over massively again in WWE whether people remember this or not. They just can't seem to stomach Taker losin'
Yeah, I believe that's how that played out. Not sure there was even a reason why both belts needed to be at play there. Just WWE logic I guess, and wanting to be triple sure that the stakes were high enough for it to be the main event.