General Chit-Chat Thread - No Spoilers

[Marty McFourth]

I would have liked Roman vs. Lesnar vs. Rollins for the title with Rollins being the winner

This would be a nice triple threat. We got a small taste of it when Seth cashed in at Mania 31

 

[CakeWalker]

a casual viewer doesnt care about the night after

 

[CakeWalker]

they only care about that night

 

[Rosie]

Full timer Roman Reigns beats part timer Brock at least

That's true. His current character, although perhaps they book him so strong that to a degree some of his opponents get "buried" on occasion, still a great character.

 

[InSaNe]

Would it be better if Brock and Ronda didn't win everything?

Uh, yeah? I mean, technically Brock Lesnar COULD get a title shot, ANY DAY. ANY TIME. Rumbles are supposed to be an underdog's chance to be at WrestleMania. Like Austin the first time. Like Alberto Del Rio, Sheamus, Drew McIntyre.

Here's a list of winners if you're interested... https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wrestleview.com/royal-rumble-winners/?amp

 

[Rosie]

a casual viewer doesnt care about the night after

But every hardcore fan starts as a casual fan

 

[CakeWalker]

what i meane is

 

[CakeWalker]

some casuals are never going to commit to watching the whole year

 

[CakeWalker]

but they will buy mania

 

[Redboy123@]

Who are these million plus US viewers who watch raw every week. Are thry casuals or hard-core fans.

 

[CakeWalker]

like some people only go to church on christmas day

 

[CakeWalker]

and im talking global market

 

[Poyser]

fellers

 

[CakeWalker]

if you watch wwe every week - you're a hardcore fan. Lets be honest

 

[Marty McFourth]

Brock is almost certainly winning the Chamber right? I'd be surprised if not, it's his debut in that match too which has always been surprising to me that he has never been booked in it