General Chit-Chat Thread - No Spoilers

[Chris]

Business wise I think so

 

[Sky]

In his 1990 WCW Champ run he was one

 

[Bobby Barrows]

Probably because he was injured for over a year.

 

[Chris]

Wasn't WCW hemorrhaging money early 90s lol

 

[Sky]

There's actually a really interesting Observer analysis of it

 

[Sky]

(check out my thread)

 

[Bobby Barrows]

If Sting didn't tear his ACL in 1989, chances are he'd be a god.

 

[Kross Rhodes]

Cena worked for a minute, but wwe refused to turn him.

A quick heel run in 2006-2007 would have fixed him.

He’d have turned back baby 6 months later and been huge.

 

[Chris]

But would he have drawn more money after Flair left

 

[Bobby Barrows]

But would he have drawn more money after Flair left

That depends on Jim Herd, who was principally the reason WCW was losing so much money.

 

[Kross Rhodes]

Sting drew their biggest buy in 1997.

If he had trained properly in his year off, 1998 would have been a huge year for him.

That and Goldberg getting hot fucked him.

But those two together could have drawn money.

 

[Sky]

Sting drew their biggest buy in 1997. If he had trained properly in his year off, 1998 would have been a huge year for him. That and Goldberg getting hot fucked him. But those two together could have drawn money.

Ignoring the fact that Hogan talked Nick Patrick into burying the Starrcade 97 finish and making Sting and Bret Hart look like morons?

 

[Bobby Barrows]

Starrcade 1997 sucks btw.

 

[Bobby Barrows]

The whole show is just so bad.

 

[Sabretooth]

Cena worked for a minute, but wwe refused to turn him. A quick heel run in 2006-2007 would have fixed him. He’d have turned back baby 6 months later and been huge.

you’re probably right. 2006 would’ve been the time to do it.