- Joined
- Dec 2, 2019
- Messages
- 245,645
- Reaction score
- 76,839
- Points
- 118
- Age
- 38
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
capitalism and socialism are not opposing philosophiesSanguinello said:but its still very much capitalism
capitalism and socialism are not opposing philosophiesSanguinello said:but its still very much capitalism
Yeah was about to correct you here but from what I remember that's all trueGrim Reaper said:Forgive me, I meant South Carolina sold the deed to the land.
Of course not. You can totally have a Socialist Capitalist nation. The state itself would be a corporation.Jeff Valley Driver said:capitalism and socialism are not opposing philosophies
pretty much what we have nowGrim Reaper said:Of course not. You can totally have a Socialist Capitalist nation. The state itself would be a corporation.
It was part of the land below the Mason Dixon. They gave them plenty of warning to leave. The attack only happened after the Secretary of War sent several warships to the Fort and the South thought they were being invaded.Grim Reaper said:Didn't the Confederacy attacked a US outpost known as Fort Sumter first? And don't tell me that it was Confederate property. Virginia sold the estate to the US Federal Army long before the Civil War, it was Federal property, the facts are there.
I said ruled , not owned.Chris said:the president doesn't own us, this is AMERICA so that wouldn't count smh
Isn't that what most so-called "People's Republics" do nowadaysGrim Reaper said:Of course not. You can totally have a Socialist Capitalist nation. The state itself would be a corporation.
Then it doesn't count, he didn't own the slavesJobber Doink said:I said ruled , not owned.
The biggest thing people have on Lincoln is suspending Habeus Corpus, which at first was only along rail lines, and later had Congress approval.Chris said:"The war of Northern aggression"