what a trollButters said:He always just says stuff like, “i was going to call you but i know you dont watch because lesnar is back”
I didn't want to be the one to compare but this year specifically it sounds like war games being so tame suffered from being 2 weeks after an all timer blood n guts. Fans of both were likely dissapointed especially that from what I heard that the women's match was rather anticlimactic as well which is unusual for the wwe women at pleJimmy King said:My best friend and his wife went to the show. He overheard people saying that blood n guts was better and he agreed
I think it's fair to compare the "same match" 2 weeks apart . I think comparing both companies is fair as long as there's similar variables and matches. I do think they aim for different things but ya I do think it's a legit complaint. Not that anyone expected the same violence but there was a severe lack of entertainment to WWE's wargames matches imoButters said:Well, they should judge the product on its own without comparing but it wouldn’t surprise me if they are right
ya from what I read it was not a bad match at all but kind of unmemorable/ soft ? You guys obviously have a more useful opinion as I did not watch it myselfJimmy King said:I thought the women’s WarGames was alright but I did like the women’s bng better. Men’s WarGames was fun but it felt rushed