yes you made me wonder if it actually could backfire on them if people are against limits, but I think they're assuming most people are for limits and that's why it's not mentioned that 2 is already the limitJacob Fox said:@Chris that is an interesting question. I probably would have voted to raise it because I always research elections I can vote on before hand. So if I knew it was 2 already, I would have voted yes. If I was misinformed and DIDN'T know it was already limited, I would have voted no
no I had researched and knew before too so same deal, that's why I gave the info before askingJacob Fox said:Not trying to sound like a know it all, because I of course knew nothing of that before you told me
That should not be legal. If they do that, it should only apply to the next people electedChris said:But yeah the mayor is basically at the end of his second term and they added this provision right at deadline to raise term limits for him and the council
the second provision is for the mayor and council to have a raise starting next term tooJacob Fox said:Like in Congress... if they vote themselves a raise, it doesn't come into existence until the next Congress
blechChris said:the second provision is for the mayor and council to have a raise starting next term too