Full WWE 13 roster revealed

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Leo C

Backlund Mark
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
23,437
Reaction score
2,232
Points
0
Age
29
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
stephan1 said:
It'll probably be a DLC. It's not enough to make 50-60 dollars off the game. THQ has to get you to pay 10-20 more for DLC.

Scumbags.
 

Donald Trump_

WWEF Forums Sickest Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
5,038
Reaction score
255
Points
0
Location
LA, Cali
tbh i think WWE should give the game to 2k or EA. They'd do a lot better with it than THQ. What do you think?
 

Leo C

Backlund Mark
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
23,437
Reaction score
2,232
Points
0
Age
29
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
stephan1 said:
tbh i think WWE should give the game to 2k or EA. They'd do a lot better with it than THQ. What do you think?

I've read discussions on this. It might not be that good, think about it: THQ has worked with wrestling games for over 10 years. They know the tricks of the trade, they're probably the company with the most experience. If you handed the game to any other company, you'd probably have something like TNA/AAA games, not very good, because it's the first time they're working with it. In a few years, could they get better? Yes. Would it be a good idea immediately? No.
 

Donald Trump_

WWEF Forums Sickest Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
5,038
Reaction score
255
Points
0
Location
LA, Cali
Leo C said:
I've read discussions on this. It might not be that good, think about it: THQ has worked with wrestling games for over 10 years. They know the tricks of the trade, they're probably the company with the most experience. If you handed the game to any other company, you'd probably have something like TNA/AAA games, not very good, because it's the first time they're working with it. In a few years, could they get better? Yes. Would it be a good idea immediately? No.

THQ is going broke, that's why they make DLC's. If I have to put up with some low quality games for a couple years but it will mean no DLC's and they company will actually listen to the fans, like adding GM Mode, I'll take it.

Plus, if they do hand it to another company, the company will just take Previous WWE/SvR games by THQ and make it better than THQ seemed to. It's not like they have to start from scratch.
 

Leo C

Backlund Mark
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
23,437
Reaction score
2,232
Points
0
Age
29
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
stephan1 said:
THQ is going broke, that's why they make DLC's. If I have to put up with some low quality games for a couple years but it will mean no DLC's and they company will actually listen to the fans, like adding GM Mode, I'll take it.

Plus, if they do hand it to another company, the company will just take Previous WWE/SvR games by THQ and make it better than THQ seemed to. It's not like they have to start from scratch.

It could work that way, I don't know. It would be good to have a change, but I wouldn't want to have crappy games just so I don't have to buy DLC, I can live without it. I'm not sure whether THQ listens to their fans or not, they seem to add some things people complained about from year to year, but not all of them.
 

Hannah Bee

PhilWres Babe
Joined
Apr 1, 2012
Messages
3,805
Reaction score
325
Points
0
Age
28
Location
England/Manila, Philippines
Website
www.twitter.com
Stopspot said:
Bleacher Report reported via IGN the full WWE 13 roster.


LOL no Del Rio. One thought winning the Royal Rumble and Money in the bank plus the WWE title twice would qualify you for the video game.

AND NO RILEY? NOOOOOOOO...

And who're in the Diva's set? :eek:tunga:
 

Leo C

Backlund Mark
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
23,437
Reaction score
2,232
Points
0
Age
29
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
wwerulesrkolover23 said:
AND NO RILEY? NOOOOOOOO...

And who're in the Diva's set? :eek:tunga:

Well, if the numbers are real and there are seven Divas, it'll probably be: Beth, Eve, Kelly, Natalya, Layla, Alicia and... not sure about the last one. :dawg:
 

Stopspot

Now I’m a big, fat dynamo!
Joined
Apr 1, 2012
Messages
42,192
Reaction score
8,467
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Sweden
All the divas are mentioned in the OP. You just have to read through the list.
 

Leo C

Backlund Mark
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
23,437
Reaction score
2,232
Points
0
Age
29
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
Stopspot said:
All the divas are mentioned in the OP. You just have to read through the list.

I have to pay more attention. Well, not surprised with the list, I understand why the Bellas made the game and it's nice to know Kharma's in.
 

Donald Trump_

WWEF Forums Sickest Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
5,038
Reaction score
255
Points
0
Location
LA, Cali
i dont get why there are 3 different mick foley characters. why not just have 1 and be able to change them up. like changing attires for kane and masked kane
 

Leo C

Backlund Mark
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
23,437
Reaction score
2,232
Points
0
Age
29
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
stephan1 said:
i dont get why there are 3 different mick foley characters. why not just have 1 and be able to change them up. like changing attires for kane and masked kane

I hate it when the same guy's in the game twice, but with a different attire. Every other gimmick someone has should be an alternate attire, not a different character.
 

Zach

Emma Watson ♥ ♥ ♥
Joined
Dec 21, 2011
Messages
4,174
Reaction score
435
Points
0
Age
29
NO TYSON KIDD? RAAAAAAAAFH
 

Cloud

Champion
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
10,486
Reaction score
1,562
Points
118
Age
40
I aint arsed bout Foley as a mark but I doubt I'll buy this this year as was so unhappy with it last year! Probs purchase Madden instead!