Why if I may ask? Technical matches can and often do include just as much story telling as any other type of match. Hell, sometimes even more due to the way the match is worked.
That's WWE's version of technical.Because watching guys laying on the mat with their opponent in a submission hold for the duration of the match gets really boring after awhile. I wanna see action with a minimum of rest holds, not the other way around.
Because watching guys laying on the mat with their opponent in a submission hold for the duration of the match gets really boring after awhile. I wanna see action with a minimum of rest holds, not the other way around.
That's WWE's version of technical.
Also. I love 98 Japanese wrestling, good shit.
You've picked the worst examples of technical matches if that's what you think they are IMO. Here are a few examples of great technical matches:
Plus 123 vs Bret, Angle vs Brock (tons of freestyle wrestling in there), Benoit vs Guerro in 03/04,Jericho vs Benoit in the submission match in the early 2000s. There are others I could list too.
You can't go wrong with Kenta vs Misawa in general, two of the Mount Rushmore of Puro. You seen Misawa vs Joe?
I kind of like that, it's a good way to show a sample of your favourite styles rather than I like X.I'm gonna get to that a little later. It seems this just became a match sharing thread, lol.