Again, I don't see the relavance to whether or not he was an underdog.
Yes, predominantly because of Palumbo's behaviour, but if anything else was at play it was the fact that the UNDERDOG had repeatedly overcome the odds. Regardless of what peeps thought of Nobles letcherous ways they gained respect for him for overcoming the odds.
Please explain the direct relevance of someone's behaviour/personality on whether or not they are an underdog?
Or tell me....
Cena vs Vicki Guerrerro.... Who's the underdog?
The point was that they had to use an extreme circumstance to create the storyline.
So you're saying that by the heel overcoming the odds and being an underdog, he turned face? Thanks for agreeing with me that the fans want the face to be the underdog.
A face is meant to be an underdog. Do you notice the way matches go? Basically:
Face looks good.
Heel takes over using dirty tactics and control a good portion of the match, causing the fans to grow sympathy for a face and cheer them on.
Hope spot.
Underdog face overcomes the odds and makes his comeback.
Finish.
Cena vs Vickie is a different case because it's a heel with extreme heat. How is Vansen going to get such heat?