Eric Bischoff & Hulk Hogan - Just collecting a few paycheques?

  • Thread starter THE Brian Kendrick's Biceps
  • Start date
  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


THE Brian Kendrick's Biceps

Guest
When I heard that Eric Bischoff was going to TNA, needless to say, I was excited. Very excited. We all know Bischoff's history, and after listening to a few shoot interviews where Bischoff talked about how for TNA to be competition to WWE, they'd need to do something different and pick up their game (from before he signed with TNA), my anticipation only grew. And yet, since Bischoff (and Hogan for that matter) arrived, the change that was promised hasn't come. In fact, it's gone the other way.

First of all, let's talk about a certain person's stale gimmick ... gimmick. When I heard this shoot from Bischoff, he talked about how TNA needed to do something different. That's why WCW succeeded with the Hulk Hogan push. They brought him in to do something new. He also said that's why Team 3D/The Dudley Boyz are still stale. Despite TNA being legally unable to user The Dudley Boyz name and trademarks, they still managed to keep them under the same gimmick. Bischoff spoke of this as a reason why TNA would never succeed. They were afraid to do something different. Now, since The Bisch has arrived in TNA, we have seen the debut of one Mr. Ken Anderson, and needless to say I was disappointed. Not because Anderson is horrible and will likely end up to be a stupid investment for TNA, but because he was exactly the same as when he left WWE, despite him having his Kennedy trademark taken from him. Sound familiar? It should.

Aside from some old guys being brought in (of which The Band are the only ones interesting), the only other change we've seen since Bischoff and Hogan arrived was the new four sided ring. Now, while I'm sure this was the work of Hogan and co because Russo had worked with the six sided ring for quite some time now, this is another negative change for me, not only because I would have preferred the six sided ring to stay, but also because it's a purely cosmetic change, with no effect on the product, which is what Hogan/Bischoff should be worrying about. The other thing that irked me about this change was the way they went about it. First of all, they managed to turn the fans of the iMPACT! Zone against them by basically saying "We're right, you're wrong, stfu" which was ridiculously stupid. Then they went on to say it was a toy ring and that only warriors competed in a four sided ring. Erm, who dictated that? Because you said it's true, it's true? Damn, best tell UFC - and their real fighters - that they're play fighting in their eight sided ring. And finally, what irks me the most about this change is that it goes completely against being different to the competition, which is what Bischoff has talked about in the past. The six sided ring was part of TNA's identity, and now it's no longer. Instead they've said WWE's ring has been better all along, and that TNA had a toy ring, obviously making them inferior. Completely and utterly moronic.

What annoys me about this is that Bischoff and Hogan have seemingly had no positive impact upon TNA. Bischoff has gone against what he's said about TNA in the past, and he's either decided, or allowed the opposite to go along. So is Bischoff (and The Hulkster for that matter) being lazy? Are they allowing this retardedness to fly past them? Or are they not involved at all, simply looking for anther payday?
 

noumenon

Guest
Personally, I like the changes that they've put into place up until this point. I'm not going to talk about Kennedy/Anderson at all because I think he'd be awful no matter what promotion he was in, but has been especially unbearable the past few weeks in TNA.

Hogan and Bishoff are doing the right things. Why should they cater to the same 300 people who show up to the iMPACT zone every single week? That was one of TNA's major problems in the past. Their live audience is comprised of 99% smarks! How the hell are you ever supposed to grow and expand you product with a live audience like that. How marketable and successful do you think WWE would be if the same people showed up to watch them every fucking week and didn't buy into their top faces and chanted ridiculous shit every week?
Bishoff and Hogan are looking outside of that confining box of a TV studio and starting to factor in what's going to happen when they take their product on the road. Believe it or not, the majority of the wrestling fans don't share the same opinions as those people who attend the show every week. It's time for them to start marketing to a larger audience. And yes... STFU to the people in the iMPACT zone, Hogan and Bishoff do know better. Have any of those people ever ran a multi-million dollar wrestling corporation? Unless Shane is hiding in the crowd somewhere I seriously doubt it.


On a side note, I really believe the 4 sided ring makes all the difference and honestly thing the product as LOOKED a hell of a lot better since its addition.
 
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
2,923
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
41
Location
Badstreet, USA
Of course they're there for the pay checks. Hogan's other TV ventures have failed and he needs alimony-lawsuit money, Bisch's production company is better known for his partner, Wayne from the fuckin Wonder Years and hasn't done nothing notable. It's all about the money to them. Not that truly believe they can make TNA what GOOD WCW once was. But to be fair they have made some improvements that needed to be made.

But in all honesty I believe TNA is wasting their money. They truly believe in Hogan and Bisch because of their name. They're paying from name value and have learned NOTHING from history. For all the good Hogan and Bisch did for WCW they did twice the damage. I really feel that having other successful wrestling names like Cornette, Foley, and others like a Lance Storm could have been perfect for TNA, but TNA, as star-enamored as it is, went all-in without doing any research, and in the end it's costing them millions for very minimal gains. To me, thus far it looks like a bad business decision.
 

Double J

Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2009
Messages
767
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
39
Location
Louisiana
But in all honesty I believe TNA is wasting their money. They truly believe in Hogan and Bisch because of their name. They're paying from name value and have learned NOTHING from history. For all the good Hogan and Bisch did for WCW they did twice the damage. I really feel that having other successful wrestling names like Cornette, Foley, and others like a Lance Storm could have been perfect for TNA, but TNA, as star-enamored as it is, went all-in without doing any research, and in the end it's costing them millions for very minimal gains. To me, thus far it looks like a bad business decision.

I agree, if Hogan and Bischoff were as smart about the business as people believe then WCW wouldn't of went under. I like how Bischoff calls 3D stale and should of changed gimmicks. Why would you change a team that has wrestled and won championships all over the world? Why would you complain about 3D, but then bring in the Nasty Boys who have the same gimmick and the same damn promo's from 10-15 years ago.

Hell now they're looking like they're heading in the same direction as the nWo with The Band. TNA originals getting jumped in the back and most likely Bischoff will eventually come out and say that he hiered them to do it. Hell they already did the Montreal Screw Job.

TNA was heading a great direction with Dixie Carter pushing for the younger guys to take control over the veterans. Really she should of just brought in someone else like Cornette or Storm (I liked that idea, never thought about him) in to help and I guarentee they wouldn't of cost as much money as Hogan and Bischoff are costing right now.