^^^The crux of what I'm debating is whether or not he sold his family out. I don't know the TRUE E.G. (nor does your goodself), but all available evidence paints a picture a guy who grew up in a wrestling family, was wrestling from about the age of 16, and put his body (and psyche) through hell to provide for their future knowing that he probably had no other skills/trade to fall back on.
That's fine. Good for him. But did he have to take drugs? Abuse steroids? Abuse painkillers? No, he didn't. He did that for wealth and success. He could have made a nice living as he was, but he sold his his family for greater glory.
In response to your last para', no, I'm not saying that we ignore it, I just believe that his 'artistic' legacy (and Benoit's for that matter) can be (and that a rational minded person should be able to be) appreciated independent of what their personal/business lives were like.
But, it's not. People here "miss" Eddie Guerrero, RIP for him, etc. That's not his entertainment value, that's his personal life. The fact that Eddie is FAR more popular dead than alive speaks testaments to my point. And it's ridiculousness.
More appropriate to the context would be to cite that whilst a Nazi, Hitler was still regarded as a gifted painter which goes some way to once again illustrate my take on this matter.)
He may be regarded as a gifted painter...but when you hear "Hitler", what's the first thing you think of? A painter? Or a Nazi leader who led the extermination of the Jews?
But, when you think Eddie Guerrero, do you think druggie scumbag, or entertainer? That's my point.
(When I previously said "Fans didn't get to know Eddie G THE PERSON - Whether they realise it or not, what they miss is the entertainment he gave them." it was simply a response to yourself as a summization of the actual mindset a lot of your comments were a responding to.)
They don't miss the entertainment. Eddie was no more entertaining than the majority of the guys they have today. But, since he died, people want to pretend he was greater than he really was.
It's the Owen Hart effect.
Edit: Screw the Ike Turner example... There's one closer to 'home'... Randy Savage... You think the abuse he supposedly subjected Elizabeth to played ANY part in here eventual demise?
...Has Savages legacy been tarnished?
No, he is remembered for having argually the best match ever televised.
I've never heard of Savage being abusive. I've heard he was way overprotective, but not abusive.
And do I think that had a part in it? Nope. Not a bit.